Postanesthesia care unit delirium following robot-assisted vs open retropubic radical prostatectomy: A prospective observational study

被引:8
作者
Beck, Stefanie [1 ]
Hoop, Dennis [1 ]
Ragab, Haissam [1 ]
Rademacher, Cornelius [1 ]
Messner-Schmitt, Aurelie [1 ]
von Breunig, Franziska [1 ]
Haese, Alexander [2 ]
Graefen, Markus [2 ]
Zoellner, Christian [1 ]
Fischer, Marlene [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Anesthesiol, Martinistr 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Klin Prostate Canc Ctr, Hamburg, Germany
[3] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Intens Care Med, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
anesthesia; postoperative delirium; postoperative neurocognitive disorders; radical prostatectomy; Trendelenburg position; POSTOPERATIVE COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION; CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; TRENDELENBURG POSITION; CEREBROVASCULAR AUTOREGULATION; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; ANESTHESIA; PROPOFOL; PRESSURE; SURGERY; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1002/rcs.2094
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of early postoperative delirium in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) between robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in the extreme Trendelenburg position and open retropubic radical prostatectomy (ORP) in supine position. Methods Patients were screened for delirium signs 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes following extubation. Results PACU delirium was present in 39.3% of RARP (64/163) patients and 41.8% of ORP (77/184) patients. Higher age (OR 1.072, 95%CI: 1.034-1.111, P < .001), total intravenous anesthesia (OR 2.001, 95%CI: 1.243-3.221, P = .004), and anesthesia duration (OR 1.255, 95%CI: 1.067-1.476, P = .006) were associated with PACU delirium, but no association was found between surgical technique and PACU delirium. Conclusion Compared with inhalational anesthesia, total intravenous anesthesia using propofol-sufentanil, higher age, and longer duration of anesthesia were associated with PACU delirium. Based on these findings, adverse effects on postoperative recovery and delirium signs do not have to be considered in the choice of surgical approach for radical prostatectomy. Trial registration , identifier: DRKS00010014.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Surgical, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes: A Systematic Review
    De Carlo, Francesco
    Celestino, Francesco
    Verri, Cristian
    Masedu, Francesco
    Liberati, Emanuele
    Di Stasi, Savino Mauro
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2014, 93 (04) : 373 - 383
  • [22] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy vs. open radical prostatectomy: latest evidences on perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    Mazzone, Elio
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2020, 30 (01) : 73 - 78
  • [23] Open retropubic prostatectomy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: A comparison of length of sick leave
    Hohwu, Lena
    Akre, Olof
    Pedersen, Knud Venborg
    Jonsson, Martin
    Nielsen, Claus Vinther
    Gustafsson, Ove
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2009, 43 (04): : 259 - 264
  • [24] Urinary Tract-Related Quality of Life after Radical Prostatectomy: Open Retropubic versus Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Approach
    Froehner, Michael
    Koch, Rainer
    Leike, Steffen
    Novotny, Vladimir
    Twelker, Lars
    Wirth, Manfred P.
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2013, 90 (01) : 36 - 40
  • [25] Postoperative mortality 90 days after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy and retropubic radical prostatectomy: a nationwide population-based study
    Bjorklund, Johan
    Folkvaljon, Yasin
    Cole, Alexander
    Carlsson, Stefan
    Robinson, David
    Loeb, Stacy
    Stattin, Par
    Akre, Olof
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 118 (02) : 302 - 306
  • [26] An Open Radical Prostatectomy Approach That Mimics the Technique of Robot-assisted Prostatectomy: A Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes
    Ozkaptan, Orkunt
    Balaban, Muhsin
    Sevinc, Cuneyd
    Karadeniz, Tahir
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 16 (02) : 168 - 173
  • [27] Community-based Outcomes of Open versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Herlemann, Annika
    Cowan, Janet E.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2018, 73 (02) : 215 - 223
  • [28] Short-term Results after Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Compared to Open Radical Prostatectomy
    Wallerstedt, Anna
    Tyritzis, Stavros I.
    Thorsteinsdottir, Thordis
    Carlsson, Stefan
    Stranne, Johan
    Gustafsson, Ove
    Hugosson, Jonas
    Bjartell, Anders
    Wilderaeng, Ulrica
    Wiklund, N. Peter
    Steineck, Gunnar
    Haglind, Eva
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 67 (04) : 660 - 670
  • [29] A Prospective, Observational, Multicentre Study Concerning Nontechnical Skills in Robot-assisted Radical Cystectomy Versus Open Radical Cystectomy
    Beulens, Alexander J. W.
    Brinkman, Willem M.
    Koldewijn, Evert L.
    Hendrikx, Ad J. M.
    van Basten, Jean Paul A.
    van Merrienboer, Jeroen J. G.
    Van der Poel, Henk G.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Wagner, Cordula
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2020, 19 : 37 - 44
  • [30] A comparative study of anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy among men undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a prospective single institution study
    Sforza, Simone
    Grosso, Antonio Andrea
    Di Maida, Fabrizio
    Viola, Lorenzo
    Tuccio, Agostino
    Mari, Andrea
    Cito, Gianmartin
    Cocci, Andrea
    Carini, Marco
    Minervini, Andrea
    Masieri, Lorenzo
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2022, 16 (04) : 849 - 857