Postanesthesia care unit delirium following robot-assisted vs open retropubic radical prostatectomy: A prospective observational study

被引:8
|
作者
Beck, Stefanie [1 ]
Hoop, Dennis [1 ]
Ragab, Haissam [1 ]
Rademacher, Cornelius [1 ]
Messner-Schmitt, Aurelie [1 ]
von Breunig, Franziska [1 ]
Haese, Alexander [2 ]
Graefen, Markus [2 ]
Zoellner, Christian [1 ]
Fischer, Marlene [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Anesthesiol, Martinistr 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Klin Prostate Canc Ctr, Hamburg, Germany
[3] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Intens Care Med, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
anesthesia; postoperative delirium; postoperative neurocognitive disorders; radical prostatectomy; Trendelenburg position; POSTOPERATIVE COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION; CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; TRENDELENBURG POSITION; CEREBROVASCULAR AUTOREGULATION; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; ANESTHESIA; PROPOFOL; PRESSURE; SURGERY; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1002/rcs.2094
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of early postoperative delirium in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) between robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in the extreme Trendelenburg position and open retropubic radical prostatectomy (ORP) in supine position. Methods Patients were screened for delirium signs 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes following extubation. Results PACU delirium was present in 39.3% of RARP (64/163) patients and 41.8% of ORP (77/184) patients. Higher age (OR 1.072, 95%CI: 1.034-1.111, P < .001), total intravenous anesthesia (OR 2.001, 95%CI: 1.243-3.221, P = .004), and anesthesia duration (OR 1.255, 95%CI: 1.067-1.476, P = .006) were associated with PACU delirium, but no association was found between surgical technique and PACU delirium. Conclusion Compared with inhalational anesthesia, total intravenous anesthesia using propofol-sufentanil, higher age, and longer duration of anesthesia were associated with PACU delirium. Based on these findings, adverse effects on postoperative recovery and delirium signs do not have to be considered in the choice of surgical approach for radical prostatectomy. Trial registration , identifier: DRKS00010014.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Cognitive Function After Robot-Assisted Prostatectomy and Open Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective Observational Single-Center Study
    Beck, Stefanie
    Zins, Linnea
    Holthusen, Clara
    Rademacher, Cornelius
    von Breunig, Franziska
    Tennstedt, Pierre
    Haese, Alexander
    Graefen, Markus
    Zoellner, Christian
    Fischer, Marlene
    UROLOGY, 2020, 139 : 110 - 116
  • [2] Comparison of lymph node yield in robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with that in open radical retropubic prostatectomy
    Lallas, Costas D.
    Pe, Mark L.
    Thumar, Adeep B.
    Chandrasekar, Thenappan
    Lee, Franklin C.
    McCue, Peter
    Gomella, Leonard G.
    Trabulsi, Edouard J.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 107 (07) : 1136 - 1140
  • [3] Satisfaction and Regret after Open Retropubic or Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Schroeck, Florian R.
    Krupski, Tracey L.
    Sun, Leon
    Albala, David M.
    Price, Marva M.
    Polascik, Thomas J.
    Robertson, Cary N.
    Tewari, Alok K.
    Moul, Judd W.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 54 (04) : 785 - 793
  • [4] Erectile Function and Oncologic Outcomes Following Open Retropubic and Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from the LAParoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open Trial
    Sooriakumaran, Prasanna
    Pini, Giovannalberto
    Nyberg, Tommy
    Derogar, Maryam
    Carlsson, Stefan
    Stranne, Johan
    Bjartell, Anders
    Hugosson, Jonas
    Steineck, Gunnar
    Wiklund, Peter N.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2018, 73 (04) : 618 - 627
  • [5] Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy vs. Open Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Pan, Xiu-wu
    Cui, Xin-ming
    Teng, Jing-fei
    Zhang, Dong-xu
    Wang, Zhi-jun
    Qu, Fa-jun
    Gao, Yi
    Cui, Xin-gang
    Xu, Dan-feng
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 77 : S1326 - S1333
  • [6] Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques
    Krambeck, Amy E.
    DiMarco, David S.
    Rangel, Laureano J.
    Bergstralh, Eric J.
    Myers, Robert P.
    Blute, Michael L.
    Gettman, Matthew T.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 103 (04) : 448 - 453
  • [7] Utilization and Timing of Blood Transfusions Following Open and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Korets, Ruslan
    Weinberg, Aaron C.
    Alberts, Blake D.
    Woldu, Solomon L.
    Mann, Mark J.
    Badani, Ketan K.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2014, 28 (12) : 1418 - 1423
  • [8] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy vs laparoscopic and open retropubic radical prostatectomy: functional outcomes 18 months after diagnosis from a national cohort study in England
    Nossiter, Julie
    Sujenthiran, Arunan
    Charman, Susan C.
    Cathcart, Paul J.
    Aggarwal, Ajay
    Payne, Heather
    Clarke, Noel W.
    van der Meulen, Jan
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2018, 118 (04) : 489 - 494
  • [9] Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy vs laparoscopic and open retropubic radical prostatectomy: functional outcomes 18 months after diagnosis from a national cohort study in England
    Julie Nossiter
    Arunan Sujenthiran
    Susan C Charman
    Paul J Cathcart
    Ajay Aggarwal
    Heather Payne
    Noel W Clarke
    Jan van der Meulen
    British Journal of Cancer, 2018, 118 : 489 - 494
  • [10] Nerve-sparing procedure in radical prostatectomy: A risk factor for hernia repair following open retropubic, pure laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic procedures
    Ku, Ja Hyeon
    Jeong, Chang Wook
    Park, Yong Hyun
    Cho, Min Chul
    Kwak, Cheol
    Kim, Hyeon Hoe
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2011, 45 (03): : 164 - 170