Socioeconomic Status and Injury in a Cohort of Saskatchewan Farmers

被引:16
作者
Pickett, William [1 ,2 ]
Day, Andrew G. [3 ]
Hagel, Louise [4 ]
Sun, Xiaoqun [3 ]
Day, Lesley [5 ]
Marlenga, Barbara [9 ]
Brison, Robert J. [1 ,2 ]
Pahwa, Punam [4 ,6 ]
Crowe, Trever [7 ]
Voaklander, Donald C. [8 ]
Dosman, James [4 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Dept Community Hlth & Epidemiol, Kingston, ON K7L 2V7, Canada
[2] Queens Univ, Dept Emergency Med, Kingston, ON K7L 2V7, Canada
[3] Kingston Gen Hosp, Clin Res Ctr, Kingston, ON K7L 2V7, Canada
[4] Univ Saskatchewan, Canadian Ctr Hlth & Safety Agr, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[5] Monash Univ, Accid Res Ctr, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[6] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Community Hlth & Epidemiol, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[7] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Agr & Bioresource Engn, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[8] Univ Alberta, Alberta Ctr Injury Control & Res, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[9] Marshfield Clin Fdn Med Res & Educ, Natl Childrens Ctr Rural & Agr Hlth & Safety, Marshfield, WI 54449 USA
基金
加拿大健康研究院; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
biostatistics; epidemiology; farm injury; social determinants of health; WHITEHALL; HEALTH; INEQUALITIES; MORTALITY; ONTARIO; WORKERS; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1748-0361.2010.00344.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To estimate the strength of relationships between socioeconomic status and injury in a large Canadian farm population. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 4,769 people from 2,043 farms in Saskatchewan, Canada. Participants reported socioeconomic exposures in 2007 and were followed for the occurrence of injury through 2009 (27 months). The relative hazards of time to first injury according to baseline socioeconomic status were estimated via Cox proportional hazards models. Findings: Risks for injury were not consistent with inverse socioeconomic gradients (adjusted HR 1.07; 95% CI: 0.76 to 1.51 for high vs low economic worry; adjusted HR 1.72; 95% CI: 1.23 to 2.42 for completed university education vs less than high school). Strong increases in the relative hazard for time to first injury were identified for longer work hours on the farm. Conclusions: Socioeconomic factors have been cited as important risk factors for injury on farms. However, our findings suggest that interventions aimed at the prevention of farm injury are better focused on operational factors that increase risk, rather than economic factors per se.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 254
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], WHAT DET HLTH
  • [2] Long working hours, safety, and health: Toward a National Research Agenda
    Caruso, Claire C.
    Bushnell, Tim
    Eggerth, Donald
    Heitmann, Anneke
    Kojola, Bill
    Newman, Katharine
    Rosa, Roger R.
    Sauter, Steven L.
    Vila, Bryan
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE, 2006, 49 (11) : 930 - 942
  • [3] CLAPPERTON A, 2009, HAZARD, V70, P21
  • [4] Currie C., 2001, HLTH BEHAV SCH AGED
  • [5] Dillman DA., 2000, Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method
  • [6] Age, cohort and period effects in the prevalence of sleep disturbances among older people: The impact of economic downturn
    Dregan, Alex
    Armstrong, David
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2009, 69 (10) : 1432 - 1438
  • [7] Socioeconomic and sex differentials in reason for sickness absence from the Whitehall II study
    Feeney, A
    North, F
    Head, J
    Canner, R
    Marmot, M
    [J]. OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 1998, 55 (02) : 91 - 98
  • [8] Future uncertainty and socioeconomic inequalities in health: the Whitehall II study
    Ferrie, JE
    Shipley, MJ
    Stansfeld, SA
    Smith, GD
    Marmot, M
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2003, 57 (04) : 637 - 646
  • [9] Change in health inequalities among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study
    Ferrie, JE
    Shipley, MJ
    Smith, GD
    Stansfeld, SA
    Marmot, MG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2002, 56 (12) : 922 - 926
  • [10] The well-being of US farm workers: Employee benefits, public assistance, and long-term effects
    Findeis, J
    Snyder, A
    Jayaraman, A
    [J]. REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 27 (03): : 361 - 368