Raising the Bar: Improving Antimicrobial Resistance Detection by Clinical Laboratories by Ensuring Use of Current Breakpoints

被引:25
作者
Simner, Patricia J. [1 ]
Rauch, Carol A. [2 ]
Martin, Isabella W. [3 ]
Sullivan, Kaede, V [4 ]
Rhoads, Daniel [5 ]
Rolf, Robin [6 ]
She, Rosemary [7 ]
Souers, Rhona J. [6 ]
Wojewoda, Christina [8 ]
Humphries, Romney M. [9 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Vanderbilt Univ, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
[3] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Lebanon, NH 03766 USA
[4] Temple Univ Hosp & Med Sch, Philadelphia, PA 19140 USA
[5] Cleveland Clin, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[6] Coll Amer Pathologists, Chicago, IL USA
[7] Univ Southern Calif, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[8] Univ Vermont, Med Ctr, Burlington, VT USA
[9] Vanderbilt Univ, Med Ctr, TVC 4605A,1301 Med Ctr Drive, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
来源
OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASES | 2022年 / 9卷 / 03期
关键词
antimicrobial resistance; breakpoints; laboratory testing; susceptibility testing; ENTEROBACTERIACEAE; CEPHALOSPORINS; RATIONALE;
D O I
10.1093/ofid/ofac007
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a pressing global challenge detected by antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) performed by clinical laboratories. AST results are interpreted using clinical breakpoints, which are updated to enable accurate detection of new and emerging AMR. Laboratories that do not apply up-to-date breakpoints impede global efforts to address the AMR crisis, but the extent of this practice is poorly understood. Methods A total of 1490 clinical laboratories participating in a College of American Pathologists proficiency testing survey for bacterial cultures were queried to determine use of obsolete breakpoints. Results Between 37.9% and 70.5% of US laboratories reported using obsolete breakpoints for the antimicrobials that were queried. In contrast, only 17.7%-43.7% of international laboratories reported using obsolete breakpoints (P < .001 for all comparisons). Use of current breakpoints varied by AST system, with more laboratories reporting use of current breakpoints in the US if the system had achieved US Food and Drug Administration clearance with current breakpoints. Among laboratories that indicated use of obsolete breakpoints, 55.9% had no plans to update to current standards. The most common reason cited was manufacturer-related issues (51.3%) and lack of internal resources to perform analytical validation studies to make the update (23.4%). Thirteen percent of laboratories indicated they were unaware of breakpoint changes or the need to update breakpoints. Conclusions These data demonstrate a significant gap in the ability to detect AMR in the US, and to a lesser extent internationally. Improved application of current breakpoints by clinical laboratories will require combined action from regulatory agencies, laboratory accreditation groups, and device manufacturers.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Impact of Delays between Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute and Food and Drug Administration Revisions of Interpretive Criteria for Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae
    Bartsch, Sarah M.
    Huang, Susan S.
    Wong, Kim F.
    Slayton, Rachel B.
    McKinnell, James A.
    Sahm, Daniel F.
    Kazmierczak, Krystyna
    Mueller, Leslie E.
    Jernigan, John A.
    Lee, Bruce Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2016, 54 (11) : 2757 - 2762
  • [2] Antibiotic Consumption and Stewardship at a Hospital outside of an Early Coronavirus Disease 2019 Epicenter
    Buehrle, Deanna J.
    Decker, Brooke K.
    Wagener, Marilyn M.
    Adalja, Amesh
    Singh, Nina
    McEllistrem, Mary C.
    Nguyen, M. Hong
    Clancy, Cornelius J.
    [J]. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2020, 64 (11)
  • [3] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2020, National Action Plan for Combating Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria, 2020-2025
  • [4] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2015, NAT ACT PLAN COMB AN
  • [5] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2019, Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States, 2019
  • [6] Coronavirus Disease 2019, Superinfections, and Antimicrobial Development: What Can We Expect?
    Clancy, Cornelius J.
    Nguyen, M. Hong
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 71 (10) : 2736 - 2743
  • [7] Background and Rationale for Revised Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Interpretive Criteria (Breakpoints) for Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: I. Cephalosporins and Aztreonam
    Dudley, Michael N.
    Ambrose, Paul G.
    Bhavnani, Sujata M.
    Craig, William A.
    Ferraro, Mary Jane
    Jones, Ronald N.
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2013, 56 (09) : 1301 - 1309
  • [8] Dudley MN, 2012, J PEDIATR INFECT DIS, V1, P166, DOI [10.1093/JPIDS/PIS046, 10.1093/jpids/pis046]
  • [9] Emerging Resistance, New Antimicrobial Agents ... but No Tests! The Challenge of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing in the Current US Regulatory Landscape
    Humphries, R. M.
    Hindler, J. A.
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2016, 63 (01) : 83 - 88
  • [10] Humphries RM., 2020, J CLIN MICROBIOL, V58