Individual Differences in Search and Monitoring for Color Targets in Dynamic Visual Displays

被引:19
作者
Muhl-Richardson, Alex [1 ,2 ]
Godwin, Hayward J. [1 ]
Garner, Matthew [1 ]
Hadwin, Julie A. [1 ]
Liversedge, Simon P. [1 ]
Donnelly, Nick [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Psychol, Southampton, Hants, England
[2] Nottingham Trent Univ, Div Psychol, Nottingham NG1 4FQ, England
关键词
visual search; eye movements; intolerance of uncertainty; working memory; anxiety; ATTENTIONAL CONTROL; COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE; ANXIETY; UNCERTAINTY; INTOLERANCE; INHIBITION; GUIDANCE;
D O I
10.1037/xap0000155
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Many real-world tasks now involve monitoring visual representations of data that change dynamically over time. Monitoring dynamically changing displays for the onset of targets can be done in two ways: detecting targets directly, post-onset, or predicting their onset from the prior state of distractors. In the present study, participants' eye movements were measured as they monitored arrays of 108 colored squares whose colors changed systematically over time. Across three experiments, the data show that participants detected the onset of targets both directly and predictively. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that predictive detection was only possible when supported by sequential color changes that followed a scale ordered in color space. Experiment 3 included measures of individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC) and anxious affect and a manipulation of target prevalence in the search task. It found that predictive monitoring for targets, and decisions about target onsets, were influenced by interactions between individual differences in verbal and spatial WMC and intolerance of uncertainty, a characteristic that reflects worry about uncertain future events. The results have implications for the selection of individuals tasked with monitoring dynamic visual displays for target onsets.
引用
收藏
页码:564 / 577
页数:14
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   A role for spatial and nonspatial working memory processes in visual search [J].
Anderson, Elaine J. ;
Mannan, Sabira K. ;
Rees, Geraint ;
Sumner, Petroc ;
Kennard, Christopher .
EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 55 (05) :301-312
[2]   The Freiburg Visual Acuity test - Automatic measurement of visual acuity [J].
Bach, M .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 1996, 73 (01) :49-53
[3]   Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Maechler, Martin ;
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Walker, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01) :1-48
[4]   GRAPHICAL DISPLAYS - IMPLICATIONS FOR DIVIDED ATTENTION, FOCUSED ATTENTION, AND PROBLEM-SOLVING [J].
BENNETT, KB ;
FLACH, JM .
HUMAN FACTORS, 1992, 34 (05) :513-533
[5]  
Bennett KB, 2011, DISPLAY AND INTERFACE DESIGN: SUBTLE SCIENCE, EXACT ART, P1
[6]   Attentional control deficits in trait anxiety: Why you see them and why you don't [J].
Berggren, Nick ;
Derakshan, Nazanin .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 92 (03) :440-446
[7]   Toward a definition of intolerance of uncertainty: A review of factor analytical studies of the Intolerance of Uncertainty Scale [J].
Birrell, Jane ;
Meares, Kevin ;
Wilkinson, Andrew ;
Freeston, Mark .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2011, 31 (07) :1198-1208
[8]   Individual differences in working memory capacity predict visual attention allocation [J].
Bleckley, MK ;
Durso, FT ;
Crutchfield, JM ;
Engle, RW ;
Khanna, MM .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2003, 10 (04) :884-889
[9]   Investigating the construct validity of intolerance of uncertainty and its unique relationship with worry [J].
Buhr, K ;
Dugas, MJ .
JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2006, 20 (02) :222-236
[10]   The role of memory representation in the vigilance decrement [J].
Caggiano, DM ;
Parasuraman, R .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2004, 11 (05) :932-937