A study of users' acceptance and satisfaction of biometric systems

被引:29
作者
El-Abed, Mohamad [1 ]
Giot, Romain [1 ]
Hemery, Baptiste [1 ]
Rosenberger, Christophe [1 ]
机构
[1] ENSICAEN Univ Caen Basse Normandie CNRS, GREYC Lab, F-14050 Caen 4, France
来源
44TH ANNUAL 2010 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CARNAHAN CONFERENCE ON SECURITY TECHNOLOGY | 2010年
关键词
evaluation of biometric systems; users' acceptance; Kruskall-Wallis test; Bayesian networks; Decision Trees;
D O I
10.1109/CCST.2010.5678678
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Biometric authentication methods are being increasingly used for many types of applications. Since such methods necessitate humans to interact with a device, effective implementation requires consideration of the perceptions and responses of end users. Towards this goal, we present in this paper a modality-independent evaluation methodology to study users' acceptance and satisfaction of biometric systems. It is based on the use of a questionnaire and some data mining tools for the analysis. We have applied it on two biometric systems developed in our research laboratory. The results from this study demonstrated that users' satisfaction analysis should be more taken into account when developing biometric systems. A significant panel of 70 users was more satisfied from the keystroke system than the other one. Users surprisingly considered that its perceived performance was also better even if the used face system has a better performance with an EER of 8.76% than the keystroke one with an EER of 17.51%. The robustness of a system against attacks and its perceived trust have been identified as important factors to take into account when designing biometric systems. Results have also demonstrated significant relationships between demographic factors and their perception about the biometric technology and the studied systems.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 178
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, JTC1SC37 ISOIEC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 7 AUSTR DAT MIN C AU
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1986, MACHINE LEARNING
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1984, OLSHEN STONE CLASSIF, DOI 10.2307/2530946
[5]  
[Anonymous], USABILITY TESTING HE
[6]  
[Anonymous], P 2007 ACM WORKSH PR
[7]  
Atos Origin, 2005, UK PASSP SERV BIOM E
[8]  
BALDWIN J, 2005, INTELLIGENT INFORM P, V2
[9]  
BOUCKAERT RR, 2009, WEKA MANUAL
[10]  
CHEN Y, 2009, ICB09