Depressive symptoms following natural disaster in Korea: psychometric properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale

被引:5
作者
Cho, Sungkun [1 ]
Cho, Yongrae [2 ]
机构
[1] Chungnam Natl Univ, Dept Psychol, 99 Daehak Ro, Daejeon 34134, South Korea
[2] Hallym Univ, Dept Psychol, 1 Hallymdaehak Gil, Chunchon 24252, Gangwon Do, South Korea
关键词
Natural disaster; Depressive symptoms; Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; Psychometric properties; Korean; POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER; CES-D; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; VERSION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1186/s12955-017-0811-9
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Depressive symptoms have been recognized as one of the most frequent complaints among natural disaster survivors. One of the most frequently used self-report measures of depressive symptoms is the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). To our knowledge, no study has yet examined the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the CES-D in a sample of natural disaster survivors. Thus, the present study investigated the factor structure, reliability, and validity of a Korean language version of the CES-D (KCES-D) for natural disaster survivors. Methods: We utilized two archived datasets collected independently for two different periods in 2008 in the same region of Korea (n = 192 for sample 1; n = 148 for sample 2). Participants were survivors of torrential rains in the mid-eastern region of the Korean peninsula. For analysis, Samples 1 and 2 were merged (N = 340). Confirmatory factor analysis was performed to evaluate the one-factor model, the four-factor model, and the bi-factor models, as well as the second-order factor model. Composite reliability was computed to examine the internal consistency of the KCES-D total and subscale scores. Finally, Pearson's r was computed to examine the relationship between the KCES-D and the trauma-related measures. Results: The four-factor model provided the best fit to the data among the alternatives. The KCES-D showed adequate internal consistency, except for the 'interpersonal difficulties' subscale. Also regarding concurrent validity, weak to moderate positive correlations were observed between the KCES-D and the trauma-related measures. Conclusions: The results support the four-factor model and indicate that the KCES-D has adequate psychometric properties for natural disaster survivors. If these findings are further confirmed, the KCES-D can be used as a useful, rapid, and inexpensive screening tool for assessing depressive symptoms in natural disaster survivors.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
BENTLER PM, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P238, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
[2]   Confirmatory factor analysis of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire: Multiple factors or method effects? [J].
Brown, TA .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2003, 41 (12) :1411-1426
[3]   ALTERNATIVE WAYS OF ASSESSING MODEL FIT [J].
BROWNE, MW ;
CUDECK, R .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1992, 21 (02) :230-258
[4]   Depression following traumatic brain injury: The validity of the CES-D as a brief screening device [J].
Bush, BA ;
Novack, TA ;
Schneider, JJ ;
Madan, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY IN MEDICAL SETTINGS, 2004, 11 (03) :195-201
[5]   A Simulation Approach to Assessing Sampling Strategies for Insect Pests: An Example with the Balsam Gall Midge [J].
Carleton, R. Drew ;
Heard, Stephen B. ;
Silk, Peter J. .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (12)
[6]   The Psychometric Properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale in Chinese Primary Care Patients: Factor Structure, Construct Validity, Reliability, Sensitivity and Responsiveness [J].
Chin, Weng Yee ;
Choi, Edmond P. H. ;
Chan, Kit T. Y. ;
Wong, Carlos K. H. .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (08)
[7]  
Cho M.J., 1993, Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association, V32, P381
[8]   Validation of the Korean version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in patients with chronic non-cancer pain [J].
Cho, Sungkun ;
Kim, Hye-Young ;
Lee, Jang-Han .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2013, 22 (07) :1767-1772
[9]  
안류연, 2014, Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, V33, P875
[10]  
Cho Yongrae, 2013, Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, V32, P955