The Social Construction of Risk in Digital Preservation

被引:10
作者
Frank, Rebecca D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Informat, 4322 North Quad,105 S State St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
PERCEPTION; TRUST; AMPLIFICATION; COMMUNICATION; SCIENCE; RACE;
D O I
10.1002/asi.24247
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Digital information is fragile, yet access to digital information over time is a critical underpinning of core values and functions in our society, from open government to research and scholarship. Digital preservation research has focused on identifying technical, economic, and organizational sources of risk and has relied on an assumption that individuals will behave in rational and predictable ways in response to the same information. This article asserts that viewing digital preservation as a process that takes place in complex social contexts is just as important as thinking about digital preservation in terms of technological or economic issues. This is particularly important for understanding how individuals involved in digital preservation construct their understanding of risk because social factors influence how people construct their understanding of, and behave in response to, risk information. The author proposes an eight-factor model for the social construction of risk, which includes: communication, complexity, expertise, organizations, political culture, trust, uncertainty, and vulnerability. The article demonstrates how these factors influence individuals as they construct their understanding of risk in the context of digital preservation and how this in turn affects digital preservation decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:474 / 484
页数:11
相关论文
共 101 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1984, Normal accidents: Living with high-risk technologies, DOI DOI 10.2307/J.CTT7SRGF
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, 163632012 ISO CONS C
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, World Risk Society
[4]  
[Anonymous], GUID 73 RISK MAN VOC
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1982, Risk and culture: an essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers, DOI 10.1525j.ctt7zw3mr
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Risk Anal, DOI [DOI 10.1111/J.1539, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1981.tb01350.x]
[7]   Rethinking of risk communication: lessons from the decision sciences [J].
Arvai, Joseph L. .
TREE GENETICS & GENOMES, 2007, 3 (02) :173-185
[8]  
Baker M., 2006, P 1 ACM SIGOPS EUROS, P221, DOI [DOI 10.1145/1218063.1217957, 10.1145/1218063.]
[9]  
Barateiro J., 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), P3297, DOI 10.1109/HICSS.2012.419
[10]  
Barateiro J., 2010, INT J DIGITAL CURATI, V5, P4, DOI DOI 10.2218/IJDC.V5I1.140