Wetland restoration yields dynamic nitrate responses across the Upper Mississippi river basin

被引:16
作者
Evenson, Grey R. [1 ]
Golden, Heather E. [1 ]
Christensen, Jay R. [1 ]
Lane, Charles R. [2 ]
Rajib, Adnan [3 ]
D'Amico, Ellen [4 ]
Mahoney, David Tyler [5 ]
White, Elaheh [6 ]
Wu, Qiusheng [7 ]
机构
[1] US EPA, Off Res & Dev, Ctr Environm Measurement & Modeling, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA
[2] US EPA, Off Res & Dev, Ctr Environm Measurement & Modeling, Athens, GA USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Frank H Dotterweich Coll Engn, Dept Environm Engn, Kingsville, TX USA
[4] US EPA, Pegasus Corp, Off Res & Dev, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA
[5] Univ Louisville, Civil & Environm Engn Dept, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[6] US EPA, Oak Ridge Inst Sci & Educ, Off Res & Dev, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA
[7] Univ Tennessee, Dept Geog, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS | 2021年 / 3卷 / 09期
关键词
nitrogen; denitrification; prioritization; targeting; non-floodplain wetlands; geographically isolated wetlands; GULF-OF-MEXICO; WATER-QUALITY; NITROGEN REMOVAL; LANDSCAPE; HYPOXIA;
D O I
10.1088/2515-7620/ac2125
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Wetland restoration is a primary management option for removing surplus nitrogen draining from agricultural landscapes. However, wetland capacity to mitigate nitrogen losses at large river-basin scales remains uncertain. This is largely due to a limited number of studies that address the cumulative and dynamic effects of restored wetlands across the landscape on downstream nutrient conditions. We analyzed wetland restoration impacts on modeled nitrate dynamics across 279 subbasins comprising the similar to 0.5 million km(2) Upper Mississippi River Basin (UMRB), USA, which covers eight states and houses similar to 30 million people. Restoring similar to 8,000 km(2) of wetlands will reduce mean annual nitrate loads to the UMRB outlet by 12%, a substantial improvement over existing conditions but markedly less than widely cited estimates. Our lower wetland efficacy estimates are partly attributed to improved representation of processes not considered by preceding empirical studies - namely the potential for nitrate to bypass wetlands (i.e., via subsurface tile drainage) and be stored or transformed within the river network itself. Our novel findings reveal that wetlands mitigate surplus nitrogen basin-wide, yet they may not be as universally effective in tiled landscapes and because of river network processing.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Marginal land suitability for switchgrass, Miscanthus and hybrid poplar in the Upper Mississippi River Basin (UMRB) [J].
Feng, Qingyu ;
Chaubey, Indrajeet ;
Engel, Bernard ;
Cibin, Raj ;
Sudheer, K. P. ;
Volenec, Jeffrey .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2017, 93 :356-365
[42]   Summer nitrate uptake and denitrification in an upper Mississippi River backwater lake: the role of rooted aquatic vegetation [J].
Rebecca M. Kreiling ;
William B. Richardson ;
Jennifer C. Cavanaugh ;
Lynn A. Bartsch .
Biogeochemistry, 2011, 104 :309-324
[43]   High and low flow nitrate distribution and its implications for nitrate retention in Navigation Pool 8, Upper Mississippi River (UMR), and in a high-nitrate tributary, the Root River, USA [J].
Triska, Frank J. ;
Duff, John H. ;
Warren, Ean ;
Godsy, E. M. ;
Jackman, Alan P. ;
Avanzino, Ronald J. .
International Association of Theoretical and Applied Limnology, Vol 29, Pt 4, Proceedings, 2006, 29 :1729-1735
[44]   Sediment microbial enzyme activity as an indicator of nutrient limitation in the great rivers of the Upper Mississippi River basin [J].
Hill, Brian H. ;
Elonen, Colleen M. ;
Jicha, Terri M. ;
Bolgrien, David W. ;
Moffett, Mary F. .
BIOGEOCHEMISTRY, 2010, 97 (2-3) :195-209
[45]   Evaluation of Drought Implications on Ecosystem Services: Freshwater Provisioning and Food Provisioning in the Upper Mississippi River Basin [J].
Li, Ping ;
Omani, Nina ;
Chaubey, Indrajeet ;
Wei, Xiaomei .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 14 (05)
[46]   Sediment source fingerprinting as an aid to large-scale landscape conservation and restoration: A review for the Mississippi River Basin [J].
Xu, Zhen ;
Belmont, Patrick ;
Brahney, Janice ;
Gellis, Allen C. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 324
[47]   An Approach for Prioritizing Natural Infrastructure Practices to Mitigate Flood and Nitrate Risks in the Mississippi-Atchafalaya River Basin [J].
Schilling, Keith E. ;
Mount, Jerry ;
Suttles, Kelly M. ;
McLellan, Eileen L. ;
Gassman, Phillip W. ;
White, Michael J. ;
Arnold, Jeffrey G. .
LAND, 2023, 12 (02)
[48]   Assessing the impacts of climate change and tillage practices on stream flow, crop and sediment yields from the Mississippi River Basin [J].
Parajuli, P. B. ;
Jayakody, P. ;
Sassenrath, G. F. ;
Ouyang, Y. .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2016, 168 :112-124
[49]   Evaluation of selected watershed characteristics to identify best management practices to reduce Nebraskan nitrate loads from Nebraska to the Mississippi/Atchafalaya River basin [J].
Mittelstet, Aaron R. ;
Gilmore, Troy E. ;
Messer, Tiffany ;
Rudnick, Daran R. ;
Heatherly, Thomas .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 277 :1-10
[50]   Analysis of alternative climate datasets and evapotranspiration methods for the Upper Mississippi River Basin using SWAT within HAWQS [J].
Chen, Manyu ;
Gassman, Philip W. ;
Srinivasan, Raghavan ;
Cui, Yuanlai ;
Arritt, Raymond .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 720