Nurse-midwives' use of and attitudes towards epidural analgesia

被引:18
作者
Graninger, EM [1 ]
McCool, WP [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Sch Nursing, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF NURSE-MIDWIFERY | 1998年 / 43卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0091-2182(98)00017-2
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
The use of epidural analgesia for labor and birth has risen dramatically in the United States, and nurse-midwives are caring for increasingly greater numbers of women who deliver under epidural analgesia. The authors of this investigation undertook a national survey by mailed questionnaire to explore the use of and attitudes toward epidural analgesia among certified nurse-midwives;A stratified, random sample of one-half of American College of Nurse-Midwives members was polled, and 1,605 (60.7%) questionnaires were returned. A slight majority of certified nurse-midwives (CNMs) (53%) reported a negative attitude toward the increased use of epidurals in CNM practice,and 64% reported concern over the increased number of their clients who desire epidural anesthesia. CNMs were almost evenly split on the issue of whether nurse-midwives should discourage the use of epidurals in nurse-midwifery practice. For those CNMs with epidural analgesia available at their primary birth site (87% of the sample), the mean CNM epidural rate was 26%. Various reasons for the increased use of epidural analgesia in CNM practice are explored, as are the possible implications of such increased use in contemporary nurse-midwifery practice. Suggestions for further research are offered. (C) 1998 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 261
页数:12
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] *ACOG COMM OP, 1993, INT J OBSTET, V42, P73
  • [2] [Anonymous], OBSTETRIC MYTHS VERS
  • [3] Callister L C, 1995, J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs, V24, P327, DOI 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1995.tb02484.x
  • [4] IN THE PRESENT STATE OF OUR KNOWLEDGE - EARLY USE OF OPIOIDS IN OBSTETRICS
    CATON, D
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1995, 82 (03) : 779 - 784
  • [5] EPIDURAL ANALGESIA FOR LABOR AND VAGINAL DELIVERY
    CHEEK, TG
    GUTSCHE, BB
    [J]. CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1987, 30 (03) : 515 - 529
  • [6] CESAREAN-SECTION RATES IN LOW-RISK PRIVATE PATIENTS MANAGED BY CERTIFIED NURSE-MIDWIVES AND OBSTETRICIANS
    DAVIS, LG
    RIEDMANN, GL
    SAPIRO, M
    MINOGUE, JP
    KAZER, RR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSE-MIDWIFERY, 1994, 39 (02): : 91 - 97
  • [7] Davis-Floyd R., 1992, Birth as an American rite of passage
  • [8] FIELDS SA, 1993, PRIMARY CARE, V20, P705
  • [9] Fink A., 1995, How to measure survey reliability and validity, V7
  • [10] Practice styles - A comparison of obstetricians and nurse-midwives
    Fullerton, JT
    Hollenbach, KA
    Wingard, DL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSE-MIDWIFERY, 1996, 41 (03): : 243 - 250