Identifying the status and differences between urban and rural residents' behaviors and attitudes toward express packaging waste management in Guangdong Province, China

被引:40
作者
Cai, Kaihan [1 ]
Xie, Yifeng [2 ]
Song, Qingbin [2 ]
Sheng, Ni [3 ]
Wen, Zongguo [4 ]
机构
[1] Macau Univ Sci & Technol, Macao Inst Syst Engn, Macau 999078, Peoples R China
[2] Macau Univ Sci & Technol, Macao Environm Res Inst, Macau 999078, Peoples R China
[3] Macau Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Business, Macau 999078, Peoples R China
[4] Tsinghua Univ, State Key Joint Lab Environm Simulat & Pollut Con, Sch Environm, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Express packaging waste; Behaviors and attitudes; Willingness to pay (WTP); Urban and rural areas; Guangdong Province; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; SOLID-WASTE; ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN; CONSUMERS BEHAVIOR; MOBILE PHONES; COLLECTION; DELIVERY; VALUES; CITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148996
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With the rapid development of the express delivery industry, the environmental issues of express packaging waste (EPW) have gradually attracted public attention worldwide. As important participants, consumers' behav-iors and attitudes will play a vital role in solving the problem. This study uses the conditional value method (CVM) to evaluate the differences in the attitudes and willingness to pay of urban and rural residents toward EPW in Guangdong Province, China. The results show that the respondents have limited knowledge of the recycling situation, relevant policies and environmental impacts of express delivery packaging, although more than 60% of respondents do think that there is a problem with excessive packaging. The low recycling rate for packaging materials is mainly attributed to the lack of recycling facilities and publicity on environmental issues. The differences between urban and rural residents are mainly over disposal methods, the views on excessive packaging and willingness to pay (WTP) for EPW. Finally, the WTP values of urban and rural residents choosing a "deposit" system are 1.58 ($0.24) and 1.79 yuan ($0.28) per piece, respectively, while the WTP values (for in-creased fees) are 0.64 yuan ($0.10) and 0.60 yuan ($0.09) per piece, respectively. The obtained results may serve as a reference for different regional responses to the promotion and improvement of EPW management in the future. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] Willingness to pay for waste management improvement in Dhaka city, Bangladesh
    Afroz, Rafia
    Hanaki, Keisuke
    Hasegawa-Kurisu, Kiyo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 90 (01) : 492 - 503
  • [2] Aljerf L., 2016, Journal of Environmental Studies, V2, P1, DOI DOI 10.13188/2471-4879.1000012
  • [3] Data of thematic analysis of farmer's use behavior of recycled industrial wastewater
    Aljerf, Loai
    [J]. DATA IN BRIEF, 2018, 21 : 240 - 250
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2018, SOCIAL SCI DIGEST
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2017, REPORT STATUS TRENDS
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2016, CHINA HIGH ED RES
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2020, INT BUSINESS DAILY
  • [8] Arcury TA., 1993, J ENVIRON EDUC, V25, P19
  • [9] Break Free From Plastic China and GREENPEACE, 2019, CHIN EXPR PACK WAST
  • [10] Uncovering residents' behaviors, attitudes, and WTP for recycling e-waste: a case study of Zhuhai city, China
    Cai, Kaihan
    Song, Qingbin
    Peng, Shaohong
    Yuan, Wenyi
    Liang, Yangyang
    Li, Jinhui
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (02) : 2386 - 2399