Energy use patterns and econometric models of major greenhouse vegetable productions in Iran

被引:125
作者
Heidari, M. D. [1 ]
Omid, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Fac Agr Engn & Technol, Dept Agr Mechanizat Engn, Karaj, Iran
关键词
Greenhouse crops; Energy use patterns; Energy input-output analysis; Energy forms; Sensitivity analysis; Benefit-cost ratio; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; WHEAT PRODUCTION; INPUTS; CROP; CONSUMPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2010.10.048
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper examines the energy use patterns and energy input-output analysis of major greenhouse vegetable productions in Iran. Data from 43 farmers were obtained using a face-to-face questionnaire method. The majority of farmers in the surveyed region were growing cucumber and tomato. Total input energy was found to be 141493.51 and 131634.19 MJ ha(-1) for cucumber and tomato productions, respectively. Among input energy sources, diesel fuel and fertilizers contained highest energy with 54.17-49.02% and 21.64-24.01%, respectively. The energy ratio was found to be 0.69 and 1.48 for cucumber and tomato productions, respectively. Econometric model evaluation showed the impact of human labor for cucumber and chemicals for tomato was significant at 1% levels. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the MPP value of energy inputs were between -5.87 and 7.74. RTS (returns to scale) values for cucumber and tomato yields were found to be 1.29 and 0.76; thus, there prevailed an IRS of cucumber for estimated model. The net return was found positive, as 22651.13 and 78125.08 $ ha(-1) for cucumber and tomato, respectively. The benefit-cost ratios from cucumber and tomato productions were calculated to be 1.68 and 3.28, respectively. Among the surveyed greenhouses, the result indicated tomato cultivation was more profitable. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:220 / 225
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Acaroglu M., 1998, ENERGY BIOMASS APPL
[2]   Energy and economic analysis of greenhouse strawberry production in Tehran province of Iran [J].
Banaeian, Narges ;
Omid, Mahmoud ;
Ahmadi, Hojat .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 52 (02) :1020-1025
[3]  
Banaeian N, 2010, AUST J CROP SCI, V4, P359
[4]   Energy use pattern analyses of greenhouse vegetable production [J].
Canakci, A ;
Akinci, I .
ENERGY, 2006, 31 (8-9) :1243-1256
[5]   Energy use pattern of some field crops and vegetable production: Case study for Antalya Region, Turkey [J].
Canakci, M ;
Topakci, M ;
Akinci, I ;
Ozmerzi, A .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2005, 46 (04) :655-666
[6]   Technological impact on energy consumption in rainfed soybean cultivation in Madhya Pradesh [J].
De, DK ;
Singh, RS ;
Chandra, H .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2001, 70 (03) :193-213
[7]   A case study of energy use and economical analysis of irrigated and dryland wheat production systems [J].
Ghorbani, Reza ;
Mondani, Farzad ;
Amirmoradi, Shahram ;
Feizi, Hassan ;
Khorramdel, Surror ;
Teimouri, Mozhgan ;
Sanjani, Sara ;
Anvarkhah, Sepideh ;
Aghel, Hassan .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2011, 88 (01) :283-288
[8]   Energy inputs and crop yield relationship in greenhouse tomato production [J].
Hatirli, SA ;
Ozkan, B ;
Fert, C .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2006, 31 (04) :427-438
[9]   An econometric analysis of energy input-output in Turkish agriculture [J].
Hatirli, SA ;
Ozkan, B ;
Fert, C .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2005, 9 (06) :608-623
[10]   Bioenergy and economic analysis of soybean-based crop production systems in central India [J].
Mandal, KG ;
Saha, KP ;
Ghosh, PK ;
Hati, KM ;
Bandyopadhyay, KK .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2002, 23 (05) :337-345