Framework and content of energy transition in Southeast Asia with ASEAN and the EU

被引:1
作者
Huck, Winfried [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Maass, Jennifer [1 ,5 ]
Sood, Saparya [6 ]
Benmaghnia, Tahar [1 ]
Hess, Sarah Maylin [1 ]
机构
[1] Ostfalia Univ Appl Sci, Brunswick European Law Sch BELS, Inst European & Int Econ Law EIW, Wolfenbuttel, Germany
[2] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge Ctr Environm Energy & Nat Resource Gove, Cambridge, England
[3] Tongji Univ, Chinese German Coll Postgrad Studies CDHK, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Union Nacl Juristas Cuba, Soc Cubana Derecho Constituc & Adm, Havana, Cuba
[5] SWPS Univ Social Sci & Humanities, Fac Law, Warsaw, Poland
[6] Ctr Responsible Business, Saparya Sood, New Delhi, India
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jwelb/jwac023
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
According to the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report, energy transition and globally collaborative solutions play a crucial role in mitigating or preferably preventing human-induced global warming. Factual, legal, security policy and economic determinants shape the field of energy use, energy transition as well as tied climate change policy. Both Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the EU, aware of this fact, are coordinating their endeavours to achieve a climate neutral future. This article discusses the energy transition in the ASEAN in the context of climate change considerations, the effects of this transition on people, and if and how the unique ASEAN way, law and economic governance in ASEAN are conducive to it. Here, the 45-year strategic partnership between ASEAN and the European Union (EU) provides opportunities to shape a socially just energy transition. The article shows which actors are affected by this transition, and which challenges and practical opportunities energy governance and the EU-ASEAN partnership offers. The article concludes that a long-termism approach is crucial in this regard to keep costs to a minimum by spurring concerted cooperation efforts to align and harmonize climate change goals, and ensuring a secure, sustainable energy supply. In particular, it is the absence of judicial control mechanisms for (private) actors, groups and individuals affected by the energy transition that precludes accountability and contradicts a path for extending and strengthening the fundamental concept of trust in informal governance structures in ASEAN. At the same time, it is argued that this also prevents an effective and efficient expansion of joint EU-ASEAN efforts, which for the time being, it seems, will remain political in nature with no assertive effect.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 408
页数:13
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [1] ACCEPT, EN DIPL VIT PIEC BOO
  • [2] ACE and CREEI, 2017, ASEAN POW COOP REP, P9
  • [3] Anbumozhi V, 2017, ROUTLEDGE HDB ENERGY, P331
  • [4] [Anonymous], INTR
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2015, FCCCCP2015L9REV1 UN
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2020, REUTERS
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2022, SWD2022152 JOINT COM
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2021, JOINT COMMUNICATION
  • [9] [Anonymous], 1976, TREATY AMITY COOPERA
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2022, ASEAN EU