BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION OF MANDIBULAR OVERDENTURES SUPPORTED BY MINI-IMPLANTS: A FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS

被引:0
作者
Ganesh, Thiagarajan [1 ]
Scully, Jessica [2 ]
Walker, Mary P. [2 ]
Petrie, Cynthia S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Sch Comp & Engn, Dept Civil & Mech Engn, 350K Flarsheim Hall,5100 Rockhill Rd, Kansas City, MO 64110 USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Sch Dent, Dept Oral & Craniofacial Sci, 650 E 25th St, Kansas City, MO 64108 USA
[3] Univ Missouri, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Clin Sci, 650 E 25th St, Kansas City, MO 64108 USA
关键词
Finite element analysis; mini-implants; two and four implant; bone strain; implant stress; OSSEOINTEGRATED ORAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; BONE-RESORPTION; STRESS-ANALYSIS; DENTURE; NUMBER; PROSTHESES; RETENTION; STANDARD; FAILURES;
D O I
10.1142/S0219519422500543
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
This paper presents the effects of using two or four mini-implants to support a mandibular overdenture for edentulous patients. The stresses on the mini-implants and the strains on the peri-implant and surrounding bone were evaluated and compared to known values of strength for the mini-implants and physiologic bone strain to potentially stimulate and maintain bone volume of the edentulous ridge. Two finite element models created were identical with the exception of the number of denture-supporting mini-implants. Both models contained modeled mucosa, cortical bone, cancellous bone, and two anterior mini-implants (approximating the position of the mandibular canine teeth). The second model also contained two posterior mini-implants (in the molar region). Clinical masticatory loading of three 70N loads bilaterally was used. The anterior mini-implants in both models showed stresses below the material's fracture threshold. In contrast, posterior mini-implants experienced stresses above the implant's yield limit, indicating that the posterior mini-implants could be at risk for failure. Strains in the peri-implant and surrounding bone around the posterior mini-implants were above the physiologic limit, indicating that this region might be at risk for bone resorption. The addition of the posterior mini-implants did not appear beneficial to maintain edentulous bone. Based on the limitations of this study, anterior mini-implants can be safely used for a mandibular overdenture whereas posterior mini-implants may not be a wise treatment option for edentulous patients due to risks of implant fracture and pathologic bone resorption. Dentists must weigh risks and benefits of using posterior mini-implants placed in the molar region.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
ANONYMOUS, 2005, J PROSTHET DENT, V94, P10
[2]   Complete overdentures retained by mini implants: A systematic review [J].
Araujo Lemos, Cleidiel Aparecido ;
Verri, Fellippo Ramos ;
de Souza Batista, Victor Eduardo ;
Santiago Junior, Joel Ferreira ;
Mello, Caroline Cantieri ;
Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2017, 57 :4-13
[3]   OSSEOINTEGRATION AND ITS EXPERIMENTAL BACKGROUND [J].
BRANEMARK, PI .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1983, 50 (03) :399-410
[4]  
Brunski JB, 2000, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V15, P15
[5]   Mandibular Overdentures Retained by Two Mini-Implants: A Seven-Year Retention and Satisfaction Study [J].
Catalan, Alfonso ;
Martinez, Alejandra ;
Marchesani, Francisco ;
Gonzalez, Urcesino .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2016, 25 (05) :364-370
[6]   Mechanical response comparison in an implant overdenture retained by ball attachments on conventional regular and mini dental implants: a finite element analysis [J].
Chang, Shih-Hao ;
Huang, Shiang-Rung ;
Huang, Shao-Fu ;
Lin, Chun-Li .
COMPUTER METHODS IN BIOMECHANICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 19 (08) :911-921
[7]   A comparative study on complete and implant retained denture treatments - A biomechanics perspective [J].
Chen, Junning ;
Ahmad, Rohana ;
Suenaga, Hanako ;
Li, Wei ;
Swain, Michael ;
Li, Qing .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2015, 48 (03) :512-519
[8]   Evaluation of design parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis [J].
Chun, HJ ;
Cheong, SY ;
Han, JH ;
Heo, SJ ;
Chung, JP ;
Rhyu, IC ;
Choi, YC ;
Baik, HK ;
Ku, Y ;
Kim, MH .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2002, 29 (06) :565-574
[9]   A complete finite element model of a mandibular implant-retained overdenture with two implants: Comparison between rigid and resilient attachment configurations [J].
Daas, M. ;
Dubois, G. ;
Bonnet, A. S. ;
Lipinski, P. ;
Rignon-Brete, C. .
MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2008, 30 (02) :218-225
[10]   Computed tomography for dental implants: the influence of the gantry angle and mandibular positioning on the bone height and width [J].
Dantas, JA ;
Montebello, A ;
Campos, PSF .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2005, 34 (01) :9-15