Experimental analysis of novel ionic liquid-MXene hybrid nanofluid's energy storage properties: Model-prediction using modern ensemble machine learning methods

被引:59
作者
Said, Zafar [1 ,2 ]
Sharma, Prabhakar [3 ]
Aslfattahi, Navid [4 ]
Ghodbane, Mokhtar [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sharjah, Dept Sustainable & Renewable Energy Engn, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
[2] Natl Univ Sci & Technol NUST, US Pakistan Ctr Adv Studies Energy USPCAS E, Islamabad, Pakistan
[3] Delhi Skill & Entrepreneurship Univ, Sch Engn Sci, Delhi 110089, India
[4] Czech Tech Univ, Fac Mech Engn, Dept Fluid Mech & Thermodynam, Tech 4, Prague 166 07, Czech Republic
[5] Saad Dahlab Univ Blida 1, Fac Technol, Mech Engn Dept, Blida 09000, Algeria
关键词
Energy storage; Gaussian process regression; Ionic liquids; Machine learning; Support vector machines; MXene; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; HEAT-CAPACITY; VISCOSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.est.2022.104858
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The current work employs two modern ensemble machine learning algorithms, Matern 5/2 Gaussian process regression (GPR) and quadratic support vector regression (SVR), to model-predict the thermal conductivity, specific heat, and viscosity of novel Ionic liquid-MXene hybrid nanofluids. The data for model development was obtained in the lab at various temperatures and mass concentrations. The obtained thermal conductivity value for the pure aqueous Ionic liquid (IL) solution at 20 C was 0.443 W/m.K which rose to 0.82 W/m.K due to the inclusion of 0.5 wt% MXene nanomaterial. The achieved result for the specific heat capacity of the pure aqueous IL solution is 1.985 J/g.K, while this value enhances up to 2.374 J/g.K due to the inclusion of the highest loading concentration (0.5 wt%) of MXene nanomaterial. The acquired data was divided into two portions, with 70% of the data utilized for model training and 30% (hold-out) data used for model testing. Several statistical indicators were used to evaluate the GPR and SVR-based prognostic models created for specific heat, viscosity, and thermal conductivity. For SVM models, the correlation coefficient (R) ranged from 0.9741 to 0.9958, while for GPR-based models, it ranged from 0.9942 to 0.9998. The inaccuracy in the prediction model was quantified using root mean squared error, which ranged from 0.0129 to 0.0398 for SVM-based models and 0.004 to 0.105 for GPR-based models. The predictive effectiveness of the models was tested using Willmott's Index of Agreement, which was 0.9833 to 0.999 for SVM-based models and 0.9834 to 0.9999 for GPR-based models, respectively. The close to unity regression coefficient, low model error, and good prediction effectiveness illustrate the robustness of both SVM and GPR prognostic models. However, the GPR outperformed the SVM on all the statistical indices. The experiment results were also used to compute the Mouromtseff number (< 4) and Figure of merit (> 1). The results showed that the studied nanofluids can successfully substitute water in specified applications for solar energy.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] Comparative analysis of liquid versus vapor-feed passive direct methanol fuel cells
    Abdelkareem, Mohammad Ali
    Allagui, Anis
    Sayed, Enas Taha
    Assad, M. El Haj
    Said, Zafar
    Elsaid, Khaled
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2019, 131 : 563 - 584
  • [2] Synthesis of Fe3O4-Al2O3-ZnO/water ternary hybrid nanofluid: Investigating the effects of temperature, volume concentration and mixture ratio on Specific heat capacity, and development of Hybrid machine learning for prediction
    Adun, Humphrey
    Kavaz, Doga
    Wole-Osho, Ifeoluwa
    Dagbasi, Mustafa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2021, 41
  • [3] Back propagation modeling of shear stress and viscosity of aqueous Ionic-MXene nanofluids
    Afzal, Asif
    Yashawantha, K. M.
    Aslfattahi, Navid
    Saidur, R.
    Razak, R. K. Abdul
    Subbiah, Ram
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY, 2021, 145 (04) : 2129 - 2149
  • [4] Applicability of connectionist methods to predict dynamic viscosity of silver/water nanofluid by using ANN-MLP, MARS and MPR algorithms
    Ahmadi, Mohammad Hossein
    Mohseni-Gharyehsafa, Behnam
    Farzaneh-Gord, Mahmood
    Jilte, Ravindra D.
    Kumar, Ravinder
    Chau, Kwok-wing
    [J]. ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF COMPUTATIONAL FLUID MECHANICS, 2019, 13 (01) : 220 - 228
  • [5] Artificial neural network modeling and analysis of photovoltaic/thermal system based on the experimental study
    Al-Waeli, Ali H. A.
    Sopian, K.
    Yousif, Jabar H.
    Kazem, Hussein A.
    Boland, John
    Chaichan, Miqdam T.
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 186 : 368 - 379
  • [6] Application of support vector regression and artificial neural network for prediction of specific heat capacity of aqueous nanofluids of copper oxide
    Alade, Ibrahim Olanrewaju
    Abd Rahman, Mohd Amiruddin
    Abbas, Zulkifly
    Yaakob, Yazid
    Saleh, Tawfik A.
    [J]. SOLAR ENERGY, 2020, 197 : 485 - 490
  • [7] Experimental investigation of energy storage properties and thermal conductivity of a novel organic phase change material/MXene as A new class of nanocomposites
    Aslfattahi, Navid
    Saidur, R.
    Arifutzzaman, A.
    Sadri, R.
    Bimbo, Nuno
    Sabri, Mohd Faizul Mohd
    Maughan, Philip A.
    Bouscarrat, Luc
    Dawson, Richard J.
    Said, Suhana Mohd
    Goh, Boon Tong
    Sidik, Nor Azwadi Che
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2020, 27
  • [8] 2D MXenes: Synthesis, properties, and electrochemical energy storage for supercapacitors-A review
    Baig, Mutawara Mahmood
    Gul, Iftikhar Hussain
    Baig, Sherjeel Mahmood
    Shahzad, Faisal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2022, 904
  • [9] Investigation of Electrical Conductivity, Optical Property, and Stability of 2D MXene Nanofluid Containing Ionic Liquids
    Bakthavatchalam, Balaji
    Habib, Khairul
    Saidur, R.
    Aslfattahi, Navid
    Rashedi, A.
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (24): : 1 - 20
  • [10] A systematic parametric thermal analysis of nanofluid-based parabolic trough solar collectors
    Bellos, Evangelos
    Tzivanidis, Christos
    Said, Zafar
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2020, 39 (39)