A supply chain transparency and sustainability technology appraisal model for blockchain technology

被引:378
作者
Bai, Chunguang [1 ]
Sarkis, Joseph [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sch Management & Econ, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Worcester Polytech Inst, Foisie Sch Business, Worcester, MA 01609 USA
[3] Humlog Inst, Hanken Sch Econ, Helsinki, Finland
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
blockchain technology; transparency; sustainability; hesitant fuzzy set; regret theory; DECISION-MAKING; MANAGEMENT; SYSTEM; INVESTMENT; IMPACT; REGRET; ROLES;
D O I
10.1080/00207543.2019.1708989
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Blockchain technology is a technology that can effectively support supply chain transparency. An important initial managerial activity is for organisations in supply chains to evaluate and select the most suitable blockchain technology. However, uncertainty and emphasis on sustainable transparency has made this appraisal more complex. This paper: (1) introduces blockchain technology performance measures incorporating various sustainable supply chain transparency and technical attributes; and (2) introduces a new hybrid group decision method, integrated hesitant fuzzy set and regret theory, for blockchain technology evaluation and selection. This method emphasises decision maker psychological characteristics and variation in decision maker opinions. An illustrative application and sensitivity analysis is introduced to aid supply chain managers and researchers understand the blockchain technology selection decision. Methodological and managerial implications associated with the decision tool and application are introduced. This research sets the foundation for significant future research in blockchain technologies evaluation in a supply chain environment.
引用
收藏
页码:2142 / 2162
页数:21
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
Abeyratne S. A., 2016, International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 05, V5, P1, DOI [10.15623/ijret.2016.0509001, DOI 10.15623/IJRET.2016.0509001]
[2]   Supply Chain Collaboration, Integration, and Relational Technology: How Complex Operant Resources Increase Performance Outcomes [J].
Adams, Frank G. ;
Richey, Robert Glenn, Jr. ;
Autry, Chad W. ;
Morgan, Tyler R. ;
Gabler, Colin B. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS LOGISTICS, 2014, 35 (04) :299-317
[3]   Information technology project evaluation: An integrated data envelopment analysis and balanced scorecard approach [J].
Asosheh, Abbas ;
Nalchigar, Soroosh ;
Jamporazmey, Mona .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (08) :5931-5938
[4]   The effects of technological turbulence and breadth on supply chain technology acceptance and adoption [J].
Autry, Chad W. ;
Grawe, Scott J. ;
Daugherty, Patricia J. ;
Richey, R. Glenn .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2010, 28 (06) :522-536
[5]   The impact of supply chain structure on the use of supplier socially responsible practices [J].
Awaysheh, Amrou ;
Klassen, Robert D. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2010, 30 (12) :1246-1268
[6]  
Axios, 2018, CORP AM BLOCKCH BITC
[7]  
Badzar A., 2016, Blockchain for securing sustainable transport contracts and supply chain transparency-an explorative study of blockchain technology in logistics
[8]  
Bai C., 2019, INT J PROD RES, DOI [10.1109/TEM.2019.2946756, DOI 10.1080/00207543.2019.1574042]
[9]   Improving green flexibility through advanced manufacturing technology investment: Modeling the decision process [J].
Bai, Chunguang ;
Sarkis, Joseph .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2017, 188 :86-104
[10]   Complex investment decisions using rough set and fuzzy c-means: An example of investment in green supply chains [J].
Bai, Chunguang ;
Dhavale, Dileep ;
Sarkis, Joseph .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 248 (02) :507-521