Shear load capacity prediction of unperforated and perforated partially grouted masonry walls

被引:13
作者
Medeiros, Klaus A. S. [1 ,2 ]
Parsekian, Guilherme A. [2 ]
Shrive, Nigel G. [3 ]
Fonseca, Fernando S. [4 ]
机构
[1] Fed Rural Univ Semiarid, Arid Engn Dept, 587 Gamaliel Martins Bezerra St, BR-59515000 Angicos, RN, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Sao Carlos, Civil Engn Grad Program, Washington Luiz Highway,Km 235, BR-13565905 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Calgary, Schulich Sch Engn, Dept Civil Engn, 2500 Univ Dr NW, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Brigham Young Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 430 EB, Provo, UT 84602 USA
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Masonry; Shear wall; Opening; Multi-story; Partially grouted; Shear equations; REINFORCED-CONCRETE; CYCLIC RESPONSE; STRENGTH; BEHAVIOR; EXPRESSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.113927
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Accurate prediction of the shear load capacity (SLC) of partially grouted masonry walls (PGMW) remains challenging due to the complex behavior of the material which depends on various parameters. Relevant existing shear equations, including the equations of the TMS 402/602 (2016) and the CSA S304 (2014), are evaluated, and a new equation is proposed. Different approaches are examined to determine the most consistent way of predicting the SLC of single and multi-story PGMW with openings. The database used in this research is comprised of 96 masonry walls created through numerical simulation using the finite element method (FEM) and 59 experimental masonry walls reported in the literature. Statistical analysis shows that the new proposed equation performs more precisely than the other shear equations and highlights the necessity of updating the expressions in TMS 402/602 (2016) and the CSA S304 (2014) since their equations made the most inaccurate predictions of those assessed. Furthermore, the results confirm that is unsafe to calculate the SLC of a wall ignoring the openings. In this context, the most accurate predictions for the perforated walls were made using the proposed equation considering the strength of the wall as the sum of the strength of the wall piers with dimensions defined by the openings of the same story.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   Simulating masonry wall behaviour using a simplified micro-model approach [J].
Abdulla, Kurdo F. ;
Cunningham, Lee S. ;
Gillie, Martin .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2017, 151 :349-365
[2]   Prediction of the shear strength of reinforced masonry walls using a large experimental database and artificial neural networks [J].
Aguilar, Victor ;
Sandoval, Cristian ;
Adam, Jose M. ;
Garzon-Roca, Julio ;
Valdebenito, Galo .
STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2016, 12 (12) :1661-1674
[3]  
Anderson D.L., 1992, P 6 CANADIAN MASONRY, P223
[4]  
Angelillo M, 2014, Mechanics of Masonry Structures, V551, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-7091-1774-3_1, 10.1007/978-3-7091-1774-31, DOI 10.1007/978-3-7091-1774-31]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, S304.14 - Design of masonry structures
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2019, VECTOR2 V4
[7]  
Australia Standards (AS), 2011, 3700 AS
[8]  
Blondet JM, 1989, IMPLICATIONS US DESI
[9]   Shear strength expression for partially grouted masonry walls [J].
Bolhassani, M. ;
Hamid, A. A. ;
Johnson, C. ;
Schultz, A. E. .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2016, 127 :475-494
[10]  
BOULT BF, 1979, J AM CONCRETE I, V76, P513