A Hubble Space Telescope transit light curve for GJ 436b

被引:47
|
作者
Bean, J. L. [1 ]
Benedict, G. F. [2 ]
Charbonneau, D. [3 ]
Homeier, D. [1 ]
Taylor, D. C. [4 ]
McArthur, B. [2 ]
Seifahrt, A. [1 ]
Dreizler, S. [1 ]
Reiners, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gottingen, Inst Astrophys, D-37077 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Univ Texas Austin, McDonald Observ, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[3] Harvard Smithsonian Ctr Astrophys, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[4] Space Telescope Sci Inst, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
关键词
techniques : photometric; eclipses; stars : individual : GJ 436; stars : planetary systems;
D O I
10.1051/0004-6361:200810013
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We present time series photometry for six partial transits of GJ 436b obtained with the Fine Guidance Sensor instrument on the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). Our analysis of these data yields independent estimates of the host star's radius R-* = 0.505(-0.029) (+0.020) R-circle dot, and the planet's orbital period P = 2.643882(-0.000058)(+0.000060) d, orbital inclination i = 85.80 degrees(-0.25 degrees),(+ 0.21 degrees), mean central transit time T-c = 2 454 455.279241(-0.00025)(+0.00026) HJD, and radius Rp = 4.90(-0.33)(+ 0.45) R-circle plus. The radius we determine for the planet is larger than the previous findings from analyses of an infrared light curve obtained with the Spitzer Space Telescope. Although this discrepancy has a 92% formal significance (1.7s), it might be indicative of systematic errors that still influence the analyses of even the highest-precision transit light curves. Comparisons of all the measured radii to theoretical models suggest that GJ 436b has a H/ He envelope of similar to 10% by mass. We point out the similarities in structure between this planet and Uranus and Neptune and discuss possible parallels between these planets' formation environments and dynamical evolution. We also find that the transit times for GJ 436b are constant to within 10s over the 11 planetary orbits that the HST data span. However, the ensemble of published values exhibits a long-term drift and our mean transit time is 128 s later than that expected from the Spitzer ephemeris. The sparseness of the currently available data hinders distinguishing between an error in the orbital period or perturbations arising from an additional object in the system as the cause of the apparent trend. Assuming the drift is due to an error in the orbital period we obtain an improved estimate for it of P = 2.643904 +/- 0.000005 d. This value and our measured transit times will serve as important benchmarks in future studies of the GJ 436 system.
引用
收藏
页码:1039 / 1046
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [21] KEPLER-18b, c, AND d: A SYSTEM OF THREE PLANETS CONFIRMED BY TRANSIT TIMING VARIATIONS, LIGHT CURVE VALIDATION, WARM-SPITZER PHOTOMETRY, AND RADIAL VELOCITY MEASUREMENTS
    Cochran, William D.
    Fabrycky, Daniel C.
    Torres, Guillermo
    Fressin, Francois
    Desert, Jean-Michel
    Ragozzine, Darin
    Sasselov, Dimitar
    Fortney, Jonathan J.
    Rowe, Jason F.
    Brugamyer, Erik J.
    Bryson, Stephen T.
    Carter, Joshua A.
    Ciardi, David R.
    Howell, Steve B.
    Steffen, Jason H.
    Borucki, William. J.
    Koch, David G.
    Winn, Joshua N.
    Welsh, William F.
    Uddin, Kamal
    Tenenbaum, Peter
    Still, M.
    Seager, Sara
    Quinn, Samuel N.
    Mullally, F.
    Miller, Neil
    Marcy, Geoffrey W.
    MacQueen, Phillip J.
    Lucas, Phillip
    Lissauer, Jack J.
    Latham, David W.
    Knutson, Heather
    Kinemuchi, K.
    Johnson, John A.
    Jenkins, Jon M.
    Isaacson, Howard
    Howard, Andrew
    Horch, Elliott
    Holman, Matthew J.
    Henze, Christopher E.
    Haas, Michael R.
    Gilliland, Ronald L.
    Gautier, Thomas N., III
    Ford, Eric B.
    Fischer, Debra A.
    Everett, Mark
    Endl, Michael
    Demory, Brice-Oliver
    Deming, Drake
    Charbonneau, David
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 2011, 197 (01)