Calibrating a Basin-Scale Groundwater Model to Remotely Sensed Estimates of Groundwater Evapotranspiration

被引:8
作者
Carroll, Rosemary W. H. [1 ]
Pohll, Greg M. [1 ]
Morton, Charles G. [2 ]
Huntington, Justin L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Desert Res Inst, Div Hydrol Sci, Reno, NV 89512 USA
[2] Desert Res Inst, Div Earth & Ecosyst Sci, Reno, NV 89512 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION | 2015年 / 51卷 / 04期
关键词
groundwater models; groundwater evapotranspiration; remote sensing; depth to groundwater; Enhanced Vegetation Index; model calibration; TAMARIX-RAMOSISSIMA STANDS; LOWER COLORADO RIVER; GREAT-BASIN; WATER-USE; VEGETATION; FLUX; PHREATOPHYTES; LANDSAT; VALLEY; DEPTH;
D O I
10.1111/jawr.12285
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Remotely sensed vegetation indices correspond to canopy vigor and cover and have been successfully used to estimate groundwater evapotranspiration (ETg) over large spatial and temporal scales. However, these data do not provide information on depth to groundwater (dtgw) necessary for groundwater models (GWM) to calculate ETg. An iterative approach is provided that calibrates GWM to ETg derived from Landsat estimates of the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI). The approach is applied to different vegetation groups in Mason Valley, Nevada over an 11-year time span. An uncertainty analysis is done to estimate the resulting mean and 90% confidence intervals in ETg to dtgw relationships to quantify errors associated with plant physiologic complexity, species variability, and parameter smoothing to the 100m GWM-grid, temporal variability in soil moisture and nonuniqueness in the solution. Additionally, a first-order second moment analysis shows ETg todtgw relationships are almost exclusively sensitive to estimated land surface, or maximum, ETg despite relatively large uncertainty in extinction depths and hydraulic conductivity. The EVI method of estimating ETg appears to bias ETg during years with exceptionally wet spring/summer conditions. Excluding these years improves model performance significantly but highlights the need to develop a methodology that accounts not only on quantity but timing of annual precipitation on phreatophyte greenness.
引用
收藏
页码:1114 / 1127
页数:14
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Allander K.K., 2009, WATER YEARS 2005 07
  • [2] Allen R. G., 1998, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2005, The ASCE Standardized Reference Evapotranspiration Equation, DOI DOI 10.1061/9780784408056
  • [4] [Anonymous], 994079 US GEOL SURV
  • [5] Simulating riparian evapotranspiration: A new methodology and application for groundwater models
    Baird, KJ
    Maddock, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2005, 312 (1-4) : 176 - 190
  • [6] Banta EdwardR., 2000, MODFLOW-2000: The US Geological Survey Modular Groundwater Model-documentation of Packages for Simulating Evapotranspiration with a Segmented Function (ETS1) and Drains with Return Flow (DRT1)
  • [7] Estimating Annual Groundwater Evapotranspiration from Phreatophytes in the Great Basin Using Landsat and Flux Tower Measurements
    Beamer, Jordan P.
    Huntington, Justin L.
    Morton, Charles G.
    Pohll, Greg M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2013, 49 (03): : 518 - 533
  • [8] THE FUTURE OF DISTRIBUTED MODELS - MODEL CALIBRATION AND UNCERTAINTY PREDICTION
    BEVEN, K
    BINLEY, A
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 1992, 6 (03) : 279 - 298
  • [9] Blaney H. F., 1933, B CALIF DEP PUBLIC W, V44, P19
  • [10] Uncertainty assessment of integrated distributed hydrological models using GLUE with Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling
    Blasone, Roberta-Serena
    Madsen, Henrik
    Rosbjerg, Dan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2008, 353 (1-2) : 18 - 32