Assessing the Straightforwardly-Worded Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale for Differential Item Functioning Across Gender and Ethnicity

被引:11
作者
Harpole, Jared K. [1 ]
Levinson, Cheri A. [2 ]
Woods, Carol M. [1 ]
Rodebaugh, Thomas L. [2 ]
Weeks, Justin W. [3 ]
Brown, Patrick J. [2 ,4 ]
Heimberg, Richard G. [5 ]
Menatti, Andrew R. [3 ]
Blanco, Carlos [4 ,6 ]
Schneier, Franklin [4 ,6 ]
Liebowitz, Michael [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Dept Psychol, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Dept Psychol, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[3] Ohio Univ, Dept Psychol, Athens, OH 45701 USA
[4] Columbia Univ Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Psychiat, New York, NY 10032 USA
[5] Temple Univ, Dept Psychol, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[6] New York State Psychiat Inst & Hosp, Anxiety Disorders Clin, New York, NY 10032 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Differential item functioning; Measurement invariance; Item response theory; Social anxiety disorder; Fear of negative evaluation; POSITIVE EVALUATION SCALE; SOCIAL-ANXIETY; FIT INDEXES; PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION; LIMITED-INFORMATION; RESPONSE THEORY; BRIEF VERSION; VALIDATION; DISORDER; COMORBIDITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10862-014-9455-9
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale (BFNE; Leary Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 371-375, 1983) assesses fear and worry about receiving negative evaluation from others. Rodebaugh et al. Psychological Assessment, 16, 169-181, (2004) found that the BFNE is composed of a reverse-worded factor (BFNE-R) and straightforwardly-worded factor (BFNE-S). Further, they found the BFNE-S to have better psychometric properties and provide more information than the BFNE-R. Currently there is a lack of research regarding the measurement invariance of the BFNE-S across gender and ethnicity with respect to item thresholds. The present study uses item response theory (IRT) to test the BFNE-S for differential item functioning (DIF) related to gender and ethnicity (White, Asian, and Black). Six data sets consisting of clinical, community, and undergraduate participants were utilized (N = 2,109). The factor structure of the BFNE-S was confirmed using categorical confirmatory factor analysis, IRT model assumptions were tested, and the BFNE-S was evaluated for DIF. Item nine demonstrated significant non-uniform DIF between White and Black participants. No other items showed significant uniform or non-uniform DIF across gender or ethnicity. Results suggest the BFNE-S can be used reliably with men and women and Asian and White participants. More research is needed to understand the implications of using the BFNE-S with Black participants.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 317
页数:12
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], FLEXMIRT VERSION 1 8
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, PSYCHOLOGY, DOI DOI 10.4236/PSYCH.2011.23024
[3]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[4]  
BENTLER PM, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P238, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
[5]   Anhedonia, positive and negative affect, acid social functioning in schizophrenia [J].
Blanchard, JJ ;
Mueser, KT ;
Bellack, AS .
SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 1998, 24 (03) :413-424
[6]   MARGINAL MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION OF ITEM PARAMETERS - APPLICATION OF AN EM ALGORITHM [J].
BOCK, RD ;
AITKIN, M .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1981, 46 (04) :443-459
[7]   Specifying race-ethnic differences in risk for psychiatric disorder in a USA national sample [J].
Breslau, J ;
Aguilar-Gaxiola, S ;
Kendler, KS ;
Su, M ;
Williams, D ;
Kessler, RC .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2006, 36 (01) :57-68
[8]   Age and anxiety and depressive symptoms: the effect on domains of quality of life [J].
Brown, Patrick J. ;
Roose, Steven P. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 26 (12) :1260-1266
[9]  
Cai L., 2013, IRTPRO: Flexible, multidimensional, multiple categorical IRT modeling
[10]   SEM of another flavour: Two new applications of the supplemented EM algorithm [J].
Cai, Li .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 61 :309-329