Understanding the complementary linkages between environmental footprints and planetary boundaries in a footprint-boundary environmental sustainability assessment framework

被引:124
作者
Fang, Kai [1 ]
Heijungs, Reinout [1 ,2 ]
De Snoo, Geert R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Inst Environm Sci CML, NL-2333 CC Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Econometr & Operat Res, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Environmental footprints; Planetary boundaries; Environmental sustainability assessment framework; Research agenda; SAFE OPERATING SPACE; ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT; WATER FOOTPRINT; CARBON FOOTPRINTS; CARRYING-CAPACITY; FOOD SECURITY; INDICATORS; NITROGEN; DEFINITION; FAMILY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.04.008
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
While in recent years both environmental footprints and planetary boundaries have gained tremendous popularity throughout the ecological and environmental sciences, their relationship remains largely unexplored. By investigating the roots and developments of environmental footprints and planetary boundaries, this paper challenges the isolation of the two research fields and provides novel insights into the complementary use of them. Our analysis demonstrates that knowledge of planetary boundaries improves the policy relevance of environmental footprints by providing a set of consensus-based estimates of the regenerative and absorptive capacity at the global scale and, in reverse, that the planetary boundaries framework benefits from well-grounded footprint models which allow for more accurate and reliable estimates of human pressure on the planet's environment A framework for integration of environmental footprints and planetary boundaries is thus proposed. The so-called footprint-boundary environmental sustainability assessment framework lays the foundation for evolving environmental impact assessment to environmental sustainability assessment aimed at measuring the sustainability gap between current magnitudes of human activities and associated capacity thresholds. As a first attempt to take advantage of environmental footprints and planetary boundaries in a complementary way, there remain many gaps in our knowledge. We have therefore formulated a research agenda for further scientific discussions, mainly including the development of measurable boundaries in relation to footprints at multiple scales and their trade-offs, and the harmonization of the footprint and boundary metrics in terms of environmental coverage and methodological choices. All these points raised, in our view, will play an important role in setting practical and tangible policy targets for adaptation and mitigation of worldwide environmental unsustainability. (c) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 226
页数:9
相关论文
共 73 条
  • [1] The use of valuation and weighting sets in environmental impact assessment
    Ahlroth, Sofia
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2014, 85 : 34 - 41
  • [2] Allen M., 2009, Nature Reports Climate Change, V3, P114
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, ANN REPORT 213
  • [4] Barbier E.B., 1994, PARADISE LOST ECOLOG
  • [5] Approaching a state shift in Earth's biosphere
    Barnosky, Anthony D.
    Hadly, Elizabeth A.
    Bascompte, Jordi
    Berlow, Eric L.
    Brown, James H.
    Fortelius, Mikael
    Getz, Wayne M.
    Harte, John
    Hastings, Alan
    Marquet, Pablo A.
    Martinez, Neo D.
    Mooers, Arne
    Roopnarine, Peter
    Vermeij, Geerat
    Williams, John W.
    Gillespie, Rosemary
    Kitzes, Justin
    Marshall, Charles
    Matzke, Nicholas
    Mindell, David P.
    Revilla, Eloy
    Smith, Adam B.
    [J]. NATURE, 2012, 486 (7401) : 52 - 58
  • [6] Planetary boundaries and earth system governance: Exploring the links
    Biermann, Frank
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 81 : 4 - 9
  • [7] Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere's regenerative capacity: The National Footprint Accounts' underlying methodology and framework
    Borucke, Michael
    Moore, David
    Cranston, Gemma
    Gracey, Kyle
    Iha, Katsunori
    Larson, Joy
    Lazarus, Elias
    Morales, Juan Carlos
    Wackernagel, Mathis
    Galli, Alessandro
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2013, 24 : 518 - 533
  • [8] Does the terrestrial biosphere have planetary tipping points?
    Brook, Barry W.
    Ellis, Erie C.
    Perring, Michael P.
    Mackay, Anson W.
    Blomqvist, Linus
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2013, 28 (07) : 396 - 401
  • [9] Catton W., 1986, 11 WORLD C SOC NEW D
  • [10] Defining and predicting sustainability
    Costanza, R
    Patten, BC
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 15 (03) : 193 - 196