Site portability and extrapolative accuracy of a predictive resist model

被引:1
|
作者
Vasek, Jim [1 ]
Biafore, John J. [2 ]
Robertson, Stewart A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Freescale Semicond Inc, 3501 Ed Bluestein Blvd, Austin, TX 78721 USA
[2] KLA Tencor, FINLE Div, Austin, TX 78759 USA
来源
DESIGN FOR MANUFACTURABILITY THROUGH DESIGN-PROCESS INTEGRATION II | 2008年 / 6925卷
关键词
computational lithography; calibrated resist model; resist; calibration; hotspot;
D O I
10.1117/12.772984
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
As design rules shrink, the goal for model-based OPC/RET schemes is to minimize the discrepancy between the intended pattern and the printed pattern, particularly among 2d structures. Errors in the OPC design often result from insufficient model calibration across the parameter space of the imaging system and the focus-exposure process window. Full-chip simulations can enable early detection of hotspots caused by OPC/RET errors, but often these OPC. model simulations have calibration limitations that result in undetected critical hotspots which limit the process window and yield. Also, as manufacturing processes are improved to drive yield enhancement, and are transferred to new facilities, the lithography tools and processes may differ from the original process used for OPC/RET model calibration conditions, potentially creating new types of hotspots in the patterned layer. In this work, we examine the predictive performance of rigorous physics-based 193 nm resist models in terms of portability and extrapolative accuracy. To test portability, the performance of a physical model calibrated using Id data from a development facility will be quantified using 1d and 2d hotspot data generated at a different manufacturing facility with a production attenuated-PSM lithography process at k(1) < 0.4. To test extrapolative accuracy, a similar test will be conducted using data generated at the manufacturing facility with illumination conditions which differ significantly from the original calibration conditions. Simulations of post-OPC process windows will be used to demonstrate application of calibrated physics-based resist models in hotspot characterization and mitigation.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Impact of Groundwater Model Parametrization on Calibration Fit and Prediction Accuracy-Assessment in the Form of a Post-Audit at the SLOVNAFT Oil Refinery Site, in Slovakia
    Zatlakovic, Martin
    Krcmar, David
    Hodasova, Kamila
    Sracek, Ondra
    Marencak, Stefan
    Durdiakova, Lubica
    Bugar, Alexander
    WATER, 2023, 15 (05)
  • [32] Roadmap to sub-nanometer OPC model accuracy
    Sturtevant, John L.
    Tejnil, Edita
    PHOTOMASK AND NEXT-GENERATION LITHOGRAPHY MASK TECHNOLOGY XIX, 2012, 8441
  • [33] Model identification and accuracy for estimation of suspended sediment load
    Khosravi, Khabat
    Golkarian, Ali
    Saco, Patricia M.
    Booij, Martijn J.
    Melesse, Assefa M.
    GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 37 (27) : 18520 - 18545
  • [34] Effect of flow proportions on HSPF model calibration accuracy
    Gutiérrez-Magness, AL
    McCuen, RH
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2005, 10 (05) : 343 - 352
  • [35] Predictive performance of the competing risk model in screening for preeclampsia
    Wright, David
    Tan, Min Yi
    O'Gorman, Neil
    Poon, Liona C.
    Syngelaki, Argyro
    Wright, Alan
    Nicolaides, Kypros H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (02) : 199.e1 - 199.e13
  • [36] A UNIFIED MODEL FOR IMPROVING DEPTH ACCURACY IN KINECT SENSOR
    Peng, Li
    Zhang, Yanduo
    Zhou, Huabing
    Chen, Deng
    Yu, Zhenghong
    Jiang, Junjun
    Ma, Jiayi
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMEDIA AND EXPO (ICME), 2017, : 223 - 228
  • [37] Predictive Validity and Classification Accuracy of ActiGraph Energy Expenditure Equations and Cut-Points in Young Children
    Janssen, Xanne
    Cliff, Dylan P.
    Reilly, John J.
    Hinkley, Trina
    Jones, Rachel A.
    Batterham, Marijka
    Ekelund, Ulf
    Brage, Soren
    Okely, Anthony D.
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (11):
  • [38] Quantifying the predictive consequences of model error with linear subspace analysis
    White, Jeremy T.
    Doherty, John E.
    Hughes, Joseph D.
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2014, 50 (02) : 1152 - 1173
  • [39] Model Complexity and Accuracy: A COVID-19 Case Study
    Small, Colin
    Bickel, J. Eric
    DECISION ANALYSIS, 2022, 19 (04) : 354 - 383
  • [40] A Development of Mathematical Model for Predictive of The Standard Uncertainty of Robot Arm
    Loungthongkam, Auttapoom
    Raksiri, Chana
    2020 IEEE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND APPLICATIONS (ICIEA 2020), 2020, : 281 - 286