Understanding how children understand robots: Perceived animism in child-robot interaction

被引:104
作者
Beran, Tanya N. [1 ]
Ramirez-Serrano, Alejandro [2 ]
Kuzyk, Roman [2 ]
Fior, Meghann [3 ]
Nugent, Sarah [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Fac Med, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Dept Mech Engn, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Div Appl Psychol, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
关键词
Robotics; Children; Developmental psychology; Animism; Child development; Human-robot interaction; EYE CONTACT; BEHAVIOR; ANIMATE; DISTINCTION; GAZE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2011.04.003
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Centuries ago, the existence of life was explained by the presence of a soul (Tylor, 1871). Known as animism, this term was re-defined in the 1970s by Piaget as young children's beliefs that inanimate objects are capable of actions and have life-like qualities. With the development of robots in the 21st century, researchers have begun examining whether animism is apparent in children's impressions of robots. The purpose of this study was to use a model of knowledge structures, or schemata, to examine whether children attribute human qualities of cognition, affect, and behavior to a robot. An experiment was set up at a science center located in a major Western Canadian city, and visitors to the center were invited to participate. A total of 198 children ages 5-16 years (M=8.18 years) with an approximate even number of boys and girls were included. Children completed a semi-structured interview after observing a robot, a small 5 degree of freedom robot arm, perform a block stacking task. Answers to the nine questions about the robot were scored according to whether they referenced humanistic qualities. Results from frequency and content analyses suggest that a significant proportion of children ascribe cognitive, behavioral, and especially affective, characteristics to robots. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:539 / 550
页数:12
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [41] Richards L., 2015, Handling qualitative data: A practical guide, V3rd
  • [42] Saarni C., 1999, DEV EMOTIONAL COMPET
  • [43] AMAZING NEW DISCOVERY - PIAGET WAS WRONG
    SIEGEL, LS
    [J]. CANADIAN PSYCHOLOGY-PSYCHOLOGIE CANADIENNE, 1993, 34 (03): : 239 - 245
  • [44] SIMMONS A J, 1957, J Genet Psychol, V91, P181
  • [45] Scientific reasoning-Where are we now? Introduction
    Sodian, Beate
    Bullock, Merry
    [J]. COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 23 (04) : 431 - 434
  • [46] SYRDAL DS, 2009, P NEW FRONT HRI S
  • [47] Fathers and mothers at play with their 2-and 3-year-olds: Contributions to language and cognitive development
    Tamis-LeMonda, CS
    Shannon, JD
    Cabrera, NJ
    Lamb, ME
    [J]. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2004, 75 (06) : 1806 - 1820
  • [48] Thomas R.M., 2005, Comparing theories of child development, V6th
  • [49] Perception of animacy from the motion of a single object
    Tremoulet, PD
    Feldman, J
    [J]. PERCEPTION, 2000, 29 (08) : 943 - 951
  • [50] Tylor EdwardBurnett., 1871, Religion in Primitive Culture, V2