Expanding Suicide Crisis Services to Text and Chat Responders' Perspectives of the Differences Between Communication Modalities

被引:35
作者
Predmore, Zachary [1 ]
Ramchand, Rajeev [2 ]
Ayer, Lynsay [2 ]
Kotzias, Virginia [2 ]
Engel, Charles [1 ]
Ebener, Patricia [3 ]
Kemp, Janet E. [4 ]
Karras, Elizabeth [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Haas, Gretchen L. [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] RAND Corp, Boston, MA USA
[2] RAND Corp, 1200 South Hayes St, Arlington, VA 22202 USA
[3] RAND Corp, Santa Monica, CA USA
[4] VISN 2 Ctr Excellence Suicide Prevent, Dept Vet Affairs, Canandaigua, NY USA
[5] Univ Rochester, Dept Psychiat, Rochester, NY USA
[6] West Virginia Univ, Injury Control Res Ctr, Morgantown, WV USA
[7] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Vet Affairs, VISN Mental Illness Res Educ & Clin Ctr 4, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[8] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Psychiat, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
suicide; prevention and control; crisis intervention; text messaging; PREVENTION; INTERVENTION; HOTLINE; RISK; CALLERS;
D O I
10.1027/0227-5910/a000460
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Crisis support services have historically been offered by phone-based suicide prevention hotlines, but are increasingly becoming available through alternative modalities, including Internet chat and text messaging. Aims: To better understand differences in the use of phone and chat/text services. Method: We conducted semistructured interviews with call responders at the Veterans Crisis Line who utilize multimodal methods to respond to veterans in crisis. Results: Responders indicated that veterans may access the chat/text service primarily for reasons that included a desire for anonymity and possible inability to use the phone. Responders were divided on whether callers and chatters presented with different issues or risk of suicide; however, they suggested that veterans frequently use chat/text to make their first contact with mental health services. Limitations: We spoke with call responders, not the veterans themselves. Additionally, as this is qualitative research, applicability to other settings may be limited. Conclusion: While new platforms offer promise, participants also indicated that chat services can supplement phone lines, but not replace them.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 260
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Acosta J., 2012, TR1317 RAND CORP
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, WEB BAS INJ STAT QUE
[3]  
Becker A, 2014, WOULD CALIFORNIA ADU
[4]   Awareness, Attitudes, and Use of Crisis Hotlines among Youth At-Risk for Suicide [J].
Budinger, Meghan Crosby ;
Cwik, Mary F. ;
Riddle, Mark A. .
SUICIDE AND LIFE-THREATENING BEHAVIOR, 2015, 45 (02) :192-198
[5]   Volunteer and user evaluation of the National Sexual Assault Online Hotline [J].
Finn, Jerry ;
Garner, Michelle D. ;
Wilson, Jen .
EVALUATION AND PROGRAM PLANNING, 2011, 34 (03) :266-272
[6]   Emotional First Aid for a suicide crisis: Comparison between telephonic hotline and internet [J].
Gilat, Itzhak ;
Shahar, Golan .
PSYCHIATRY-INTERPERSONAL AND BIOLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2007, 70 (01) :12-18
[7]   An evaluation of crisis hotline outcomes - Part 2: Suicidal callers [J].
Gould, Madelyn S. ;
Kalafat, John ;
HarrisMunfakh, Jimmie Lou ;
Kleinman, Marjorie .
SUICIDE AND LIFE-THREATENING BEHAVIOR, 2007, 37 (03) :338-352
[8]   Impact of Applied Suicide Intervention Skills Training on the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline [J].
Gould, Madelyn S. ;
Cross, Wendi ;
Pisani, Anthony R. ;
Munfakh, Jimmie Lou ;
Kleinman, Marjorie .
SUICIDE AND LIFE-THREATENING BEHAVIOR, 2013, 43 (06) :676-691
[9]   National Suicide Prevention Lifeline: Enhancing Mental Health Care for Suicidal Individuals and Other People in Crisis [J].
Gould, Madelyn S. ;
Munfakh, Jimmie L. H. ;
Kleinman, Marjorie ;
Lake, Alison M. .
SUICIDE AND LIFE-THREATENING BEHAVIOR, 2012, 42 (01) :22-35
[10]   Establishing standards for the assessment of suicide risk among callers to the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline [J].
Joiner, Thomas ;
Kalafat, John ;
Draper, John ;
Stokes, Heather ;
Knudson, Marshall ;
Berman, Alan L. ;
McKeon, Richard .
SUICIDE AND LIFE-THREATENING BEHAVIOR, 2007, 37 (03) :353-365