WHO GETS THE CARROT AND WHO GETS THE STICK? EVIDENCE OF GENDER DISPARITIES IN EXECUTIVE REMUNERATION

被引:142
作者
Kulich, Clara [1 ,2 ]
Trojanowski, Grzegorz [3 ]
Ryan, Michelle K. [2 ]
Haslam, S. Alexander [2 ]
Renneboog, Luc D. R. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Geneva, FPSE, Unite Psychol Sociale, CH-1205 Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Univ Exeter, Sch Psychol, Exeter, Devon, England
[3] Univ Exeter, Xfi Ctr Finance & Investment, Exeter, Devon, England
[4] Tilburg Univ, Dept Finance & Ctr, Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
executive compensation; gender pay gap; gender stereotypes; implicit leadership theories; corporate performance; romance of leadership; WAGE DISCRIMINATION; COMPENSATION DESIGN; PAY EXPECTATIONS; GLASS CLIFF; RISK-TAKING; CEO PAY; WOMEN; PERFORMANCE; STEREOTYPES; FEMALE;
D O I
10.1002/smj.878
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper offers a new explanation of the gender pay gap in leadership positions by examining the relationship between managerial bonuses and company performance. Drawing on findings of gender studies, agency theory, and the leadership literature, we argue that the gender pay gap is a context-specific phenomenon that results partly from the fact that company performance has a moderating impact on pay inequalities. Employing a matched sample of 192 female and male executive directors of U.K.-listed firms, we corroborate the existence of the gender pay disparities in corporate boardrooms. In line with our theoretical predictions, we find that bonuses awarded to men are not only larger than those allocated to women, but also that managerial compensation of male executive directors is much more performance-sensitive than that of female executives. The contribution of attributional and expectancy-related dynamics to these patterns is highlighted in line with previous work on gender stereotypes and implicit leadership theories such as the romance of leadership. Gender differences in risk taking and confidence are also considered as potential explanations for the observed pay disparities. The implications of organizations' indifference to women's performance are examined in relation to issues surrounding the recognition and retention of female talent. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 321
页数:21
相关论文
共 123 条
[111]  
Taylor F. W., 1911, The principle of scientific management
[112]  
THIERRY H, 1998, HDB WORK ORG PSYCHOL, V4, P291
[113]   CEO charisma, compensation, and firm performance [J].
Tosi, HL ;
Misangyi, VF ;
Fanelli, A ;
Waldman, DA ;
Yammarino, FJ .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2004, 15 (03) :405-420
[114]   How much does performance matter? A meta-analysis of CEO pay studies [J].
Tosi, HL ;
Werner, S ;
Katz, JP ;
Gomez-Mejia, LR .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2000, 26 (02) :301-339
[115]   FUTURE OF DATA-ANALYSIS [J].
TUKEY, JW .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1962, 33 (01) :1-&
[116]  
Wade JB, 2006, ACAD MANAGE J, V49, P643, DOI 10.2307/20159790
[117]   Women and salary negotiation: The costs of self-advocacy [J].
Wade, ME .
PSYCHOLOGY OF WOMEN QUARTERLY, 2001, 25 (01) :65-76
[118]   How feminine is corporate America? A recent overview [J].
Wanzenried, Gabrielle .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC INEQUALITY, 2008, 6 (02) :185-209
[119]  
Weinberg D., 2004, Evidence from census 2000 about earnings by detailed occupation for men and women
[120]  
Werner S., 2004, HUM RESOUR MANAGE R, V14, P201