GHG emission estimates for road transport in national GHG inventories

被引:2
作者
Pulles, Tinus [1 ]
Yang, Hongwei [2 ]
机构
[1] TNO, NL-3508 TA Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Natl Dev & Reform Commiss, Energy Res Inst, Beijing 100038, Peoples R China
关键词
GHG emissions; GHG reporting; inventories; road transport fuels;
D O I
10.3763/cpol.2009.0056
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The annual reporting procedures of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) have now produced greenhouse gas (GHG) emission inventories from 40 so-called Annex I countries for 18 years. This article analyses a subset of these data: emissions from road transport. The article compares the reported data with the technical guidance on GHG emission inventories provided by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The analysis suggests that some countries use the IPCC's default emission factors, whereas other countries use country-specific values. In the case of diesel-fuelled road transport, the estimated emissions appear to be generally comparable between all countries for all years. For CO2 emissions from gasoline-fuelled road transport, the picture is less clear. The results suggest that the default emission factor for CO2 from motor gasoline as provided by the IPCC is about 3-5% too low. Countries that seem to apply this default value might therefore underestimate their emissions by the same percentage. The effect of this possible underestimate on trends is, however, very small. Despite the possible problem with the default emission factor, the quantification of the trend in emissions is only slightly influenced by this.
引用
收藏
页码:944 / 957
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Uncertainty and differences in GHG emissions between electric and conventional gasoline vehicles with implications for transport policy making
    Abdul-Manan, Amir F. N.
    ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 87 : 1 - 7
  • [42] Energy consumption and GHG emissions from China's freight transport sector: Scenarios through 2050
    Hao, Han
    Geng, Yong
    Li, Weiqi
    Guo, Bin
    ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 85 : 94 - 101
  • [43] GHG emission quantification and reduction pathway of subway shield tunnel engineering: a case study on Guangzhou Metro, China
    Wu, Huanyu
    Yang, Kehua
    Chen, Kunyang
    Zhou, Wenwen
    Yu, Tao
    Wang, Kai
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 (42) : 54768 - 54784
  • [44] Performance Monitoring Insight using Predictive Analytics: A Step towards IMO's GHG Emission Goals 2030
    Balaji J, Nithish
    Uppal, Himanshu
    Patel, Pritam
    Shameem, B. M.
    OCEANS 2022, 2022,
  • [45] Economic performance and GHG emission intensity of sugarcane- and eucalyptus-derived biofuels and biobased chemicals in Brazil
    Jonker, Jan G. G.
    Junginger, Martin
    Posada, John
    Ioiart, Carla S.
    Faaij, Andre P. C.
    van der Hilst, Floor
    BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2019, 13 (04): : 950 - 977
  • [46] LULC changes in Türkiye’s mountains for the 2000–2022 period and its implications on national GHG emissions
    Ayhan Ateşoğlu
    Yusuf Serengil
    Hüseyin Şensoy
    F.Şevval Bulut
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 197 (7)
  • [47] Capturing uncertainty in emission estimates related to vehicle electrification and implications for metropolitan greenhouse gas emission inventories
    Wang, An
    Tu, Ran
    Gai, Yijun
    Pereira, Lucas G.
    Vaughan, J.
    Posen, I. Daniel
    Miller, Eric J.
    Hatzopoulou, Marianne
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 265
  • [48] Life cycle energy use and GHG emission assessment of coal-based SNG and power cogeneration technology in China
    Li, Sheng
    Gao, Lin
    Jin, Hongguang
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 112 : 91 - 100
  • [49] Top-down approaches for sharing GHG emission reductions: uncertainties and sensitivities in the 27 European Union Member States
    Saikku, Laura
    Soimakallio, Sampo
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2008, 11 (08) : 723 - 734
  • [50] Public perception of waste regulations implementation. Natural language processing vs real GHG emission reduction modeling
    Gjorshoska, Ivana
    Dedinec, Aleksandra
    Prodanova, Jana
    Dedinec, Aleksandar
    Kocarev, Ljupco
    ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2023, 76