Major welfare issues in broiler breeders

被引:72
作者
De Jong, I. C. [1 ]
Guemene, D. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen UR Livestock Res, NL-8200 AB Lelystad, Netherlands
[2] INRA UR83, Unite Rech Avicoles, F-37380 Nouzilly, France
[3] SYSAAF, Unite Rech Avicoles, F-37380 Nouzilly, France
关键词
broiler breeders; genetics; welfare; courtship behaviour; feed restriction; FEATHER PECKING BEHAVIOR; FEED-RESTRICTION; FOOD RESTRICTION; LAYING HENS; ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT; DIVERGENT SELECTION; MATING-BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL-BEHAVIOR; FOWL DISPLAY; FARM-ANIMALS;
D O I
10.1017/S0043933911000067
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Under current practices, broiler parent stock (broiler breeders) encounter several welfare problems, such as feed restriction and injury during mating. Intensive selection for production traits, especially growth rate, is associated with increased nutritious requirement and thus feed consumption, but also reproductive dysfunctions and decreased sexual activity in broiler breeders. A resulting serious welfare problem is the subsequent severe feed restriction which is applied during rearing, in order to prevent health problems and to achieve better egg production. This severe feed restriction has negative effects on bird welfare as it causes chronic stress resulting from hunger. Recent research has focused on management practices to alleviate the negative effect of this feed restriction. Using both a more fibrous feed and an appetite suppressant seems most successful. There are welfare concerns involved in the mating of broiler breeders. In many countries mutilations (beak trimming, despurring and toe clipping) are carried out in male broiler breeders as a standard procedure to prevent excessive damage to the hens during mating. It has been reported that broiler breeder males show low libido but, at the same time, may be aggressive and show rough behaviour during mating, which can cause severe injuries to the hens, although some injuries may be caused by over-mating hens. Current studies aim to develop management practices to reduce hen injury due to over-mating and improve the sexual behaviour in both males and females. In the last part of the review, an examination of how breeding companies are taking welfare into consideration in their commercial selection scheme is made. In practice, although for example reduced mortality and some health criteria are included in selection programs and some alternative breeds as used, other welfare issues remain, such as feed restriction during rearing.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 81
页数:9
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
BESSEI W, 1997, P 5 EUR S POULTR WEL, P74
[2]   The LayWel project:: welfare implications of changes in production systems for laying hens [J].
Blokhuis, H. J. ;
Van Niekerk, T. Fiks ;
Bessei, W. ;
Elson, A. ;
Guemene, D. ;
Kjaer, J. B. ;
Levrino, G. A. Maria ;
Nicol, C. J. ;
Tauson, R. ;
Weeks, C. A. ;
Van de Weerd, H. A. .
WORLDS POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2007, 63 (01) :101-114
[3]  
Boulay M, 2006, P 8 WORLD C GEN APPL
[4]   Future strategies for broiler breeders: an international perspective [J].
Brillard, JP .
WORLDS POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2001, 57 (03) :243-250
[5]   Effects of timing and duration of feed restriction during rearing on reproductive characteristics in broiler breeder females [J].
Bruggeman, V ;
Onagbesan, O ;
D'Hondt, E ;
Buys, N ;
Safi, M ;
Vanmontfort, D ;
Berghman, L ;
Vandesande, F ;
Decuypere, E .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 1999, 78 (10) :1424-1434
[6]  
CHAPUIS H, 2003, 5 JOUR RECH AV TOURS, P363
[7]   Morphopathological changes and pain in beak trimmed laying hens [J].
Cheng, H .
WORLDS POULTRY SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2006, 62 (01) :41-52
[8]  
D'Eath RB, 2010, ANIM WELFARE, V19, P17
[9]   'Freedom from hunger' and preventing obesity: the animal welfare implications of reducing food quantity or quality [J].
D'Eath, Richard B. ;
Tolkamp, Bert J. ;
Kyriazakis, Ilias ;
Lawrence, Alistair B. .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2009, 77 (02) :275-288
[10]   Development of sexual behaviour in commercially-housed broiler breeders after mixing [J].
De Jong, I. C. ;
Wolthuis-Fillerup, M. ;
Van Emous, R. A. .
BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 2009, 50 (02) :151-160