Preoperative staging of rectal cancer by MRI; results of a UK survey

被引:23
作者
Taylor, A [1 ]
Sheridan, M
McGee, S
Halligan, S
机构
[1] Morecambe Bay Hosp Trust, Royal Lancaster Infirm, Dept Radiol, Lancaster LA1 4RP, England
[2] St James Hosp, Dept Radiol, Leeds LS9 7TF, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Salisbury Hosp NHS Trust, Salisbury, Wilts, England
[4] St Marks Hosp, Intestinal Imaging Ctr, Harrow, Middx, England
关键词
rectum; neoplasms; magnetic resonance (MR); ultrasound (US);
D O I
10.1016/j.crad.2004.11.008
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
AIM: To determine current day-to-day practice of and access to preoperative MRI for patients with rectal cancer in the UK, with the aim of identifying constraining factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire asking for details of rectal, cancer workload, multidisciplinary team (MDT) practice, preoperative MRI, the use of alternative imaging methods where appropriate, and an assessment of local access to MRI, was mailed to 283 UK departments of radiology. Replies were received from 142 departments (50.2% response rate). These were collated and response frequencies were determined. RESULTS: According to their replies, 135 (95%) of respondents always discussed rectal. cancer cases within the context of an MDT, usually including a radiologist. Only 49% of respondents attempted to offer preoperative MRI to all rectal. cancer patients, and 35% of respondents used MRI in less than 25% of cases. Of the 142 respondents, 73 (51%) felt their practice was currently constrained by tack of MR resources. The most frequently cited constraint was an available but over-subscribed MRI scanner. Limited radiology manpower was the next most frequently cited constraint. A significant minority stated that no MRI scanner was available. CONCLUSIONS: The MDT is a well established forum for the discussion of patients with rectal cancer, and a radiologist is usually involved. However, in the face of current guidelines, less than 50% of the units studied were able to offer preoperative MRI to all of their rectal. cancer cases. Improved access to MRI and increased radiological manpower are necessary if current management guidelines are to be observed. © 2005 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 586
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Babbie E.R., 1979, The practice of social research, V2nd
[2]   Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of tumour-free resection margin in rectal cancer surgery [J].
Beets-Tan, RGH ;
Beets, GL ;
Vliegen, RFA ;
Kessels, AGH ;
Van Boven, H ;
De Bruine, A ;
von Meyenfeldt, MF ;
Baeten, CGMI ;
van Engelshoven, JMA .
LANCET, 2001, 357 (9255) :497-504
[3]  
BROWN G, 1996, RADIOLOGY, V200, P443
[4]   The classification of cancer of the rectum [J].
Dukes, CE .
JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY AND BACTERIOLOGY, 1932, 35 (03) :323-332
[5]  
Goh V, 2004, CLIN RADIOL, V59, P215, DOI 10.1016/j.crad.2003.08.013
[6]   Effect of a surgical training programme on outcome of rectal cancer in the County of Stockholm [J].
Martling, AL ;
Holm, T ;
Rutqvist, LE ;
Moran, BJ ;
Heald, RJ ;
Cedermark, B .
LANCET, 2000, 356 (9224) :93-96
[7]  
*NAT I CLIN EXC, 2004, IMPR OUTC COL CANC M, P59
[8]  
*NAT I CLIN EXC, 2004, IMPR OUTC COL CANC M, P6
[9]   THE CLINICAL STAGING OF RECTAL-CANCER [J].
NICHOLLS, RJ ;
MASON, AY ;
MORSON, BC ;
DIXON, AK ;
FRY, IK .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1982, 69 (07) :404-409
[10]  
Pahlman L, 1997, NEW ENGL J MED, V336, P980