Health equity audits: a systematic review of the effectiveness

被引:3
作者
van Daalen, Kim Robin [1 ]
Davey, Fiona [2 ]
Norman, Claire [3 ]
Ford, John Alexander [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Cardiovasc Epidemiol Unit, Cambridge, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Cambridge, England
[3] Newcastle Univ, Populat Hlth Sci Inst, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
public health; clinical audit; epidemiology; IMPLEMENTATION; INEQUALITIES; EXPERIENCE; BARRIERS; CARE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053392
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives The purpose of this systematic review is to explore whether health equity audits (HEAs) are effective in improving the equity of service provision and reducing health inequalities. Design Three databases (Ovid Medline, Embase, Web of Science) and grey literature (Opengrey, Google Scholar) were systematically searched for articles published after 2000, reporting on the effectiveness of HEA. Title and abstracts were screened according to an eligibility criteria to identify studies which included a full audit cycle (eg, initial equity analysis, service changes and review). Data were extracted from studies meeting the eligibility criteria after full text review and risk of bias assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Results The search strategy identified 596 articles. Fifteen records were reviewed in full text and three records were included in final review. An additional HEA report was identified through contact with an author. Three different HEAs were included from one peer-reviewed journal article, two published reports and one unpublished report (n=4 records on n=3 HEAs). This included 102 851 participants and over 148 practices/pharmacies (information was not recorded for all records). One study reviewed health equity impacts of HEA implementation in key indicators for coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Two HEAs explored Stop Smoking Services on programme access and equity. All reported some degree of reduction in health inequalities compared with prior HEA implementation. However, impact of HEA implementation compared with other concurrent programmes and initiatives was unclear. All included studies were judged to have moderate to serious risk of bias. Conclusions There is an urgent need to identify effective interventions to address health inequalities. While HEAs are recommended, we only identified limited weak evidence to support their use. More evidence is needed to explore whether HEA implementation can reduce inequalities and which factors are influencing effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, HLTH CARE EQUITY AUD
[2]   Managing health inequalities locally: a baseline survey of primary care trusts' experience with health equity audit in the implementation year [J].
Aspinall, Peter J. ;
Jacobson, Bobbie .
HEALTH SERVICES MANAGEMENT RESEARCH, 2005, 18 (04) :223-231
[3]   Health equity audits in general practice: a strategy to reduce health inequalities [J].
Badrick, Ellena ;
Hull, Sally ;
Mathur, Rohini ;
Shajahan, Shamin ;
Boomla, Kambiz ;
Bremner, Stephen ;
Robson, John .
PRIMARY HEALTH CARE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 15 (01) :80-95
[4]   The COVID-19 pandemic and health inequalities [J].
Bambra, Clare ;
Riordan, Ryan ;
Ford, John ;
Matthews, Fiona .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2020, 74 (11) :964-968
[5]   Investigating the impact of the English health inequalities strategy: time trend analysis [J].
Barr, Ben ;
Higgerson, James ;
Whitehead, Margaret .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 358
[6]   Clinical audit and quality improvement - time for a rethink? [J].
Bowie, Paul ;
Bradley, Nicholas A. ;
Rushmer, Rosemary .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2012, 18 (01) :42-48
[7]  
Buck D., 2020, The English local government public health reforms. An independent assessment
[8]   Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [J].
Cumpston, Miranda ;
Li, Tianjing ;
Page, Matthew J. ;
Chandler, Jacqueline ;
Welch, Vivian A. ;
Higgins, Julian P. T. ;
Thomas, James .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, (10)
[9]  
Fraser DS., 2011, CA, V7, DOI [10.2147/ca.s25313, DOI 10.2147/CA.S25313]
[10]   Reinvigorating stagnant science: implementation laboratories and a meta-laboratory to efficiently advance the science of audit and feedback [J].
Grimshaw, J. M. ;
Ivers, Noah ;
Linklater, Stefanie ;
Foy, Robbie ;
Francis, Jill J. ;
Gude, Wouter T. ;
Hysong, Sylvia J. ;
Alderson, Sarah ;
Boet, Sylvain ;
Brehaut, Jamie ;
Brown, Benjamin ;
Clarkson, Jan ;
Colquhoun, Heather ;
de Keizer, Nicolette ;
Desveaux, Laura ;
Dobell, Gail ;
Dunn, Sandra ;
Farrin, Amanda ;
Foy, Robbie C. ;
Francis, Jill J. ;
Greenberg, Anna ;
Grimshaw, Jeremy M. ;
Gude, Wouter T. ;
Hartley, Suzanne ;
Horsley, Tanya ;
Hysong, Sylvia J. ;
Ivers, Noah M. ;
Landis-Lewis, Zach ;
Linklater, Stefanie ;
London, Jane ;
Lorencatto, Fabiana ;
Michie, Susan ;
O'Connor, Denise ;
Peek, Niels ;
Presseau, Justin ;
Ramsay, Craig ;
Sales, Anne E. ;
Sprague, Ann ;
Stanworth, Simon ;
Sykes, Michael ;
Taljaard, Monica ;
Thavorn, Kednapa ;
Walker, Mark ;
Walwyn, Rebecaa ;
Weiss, Debra ;
Willis, Thomas A. ;
Witteman, Holly .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2019, 28 (05) :416-423