Factors affecting aseptic loosening in primary total knee replacements: an in vitro study

被引:10
作者
Lionberger, David [1 ]
Wattenbarger, Laura [2 ]
Conlon, Christopher [2 ]
Walker, Timothy J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Methodist Hosp Houston, Southwest Orthoped Grp, 6560 Fannin St,Suite 1016,Scurlock Tower, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Methodist Hosp Houston, Texas A&M Coll Med, 6565 Fannin,St,West Pavil 5, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr Houston, 7000 Fannin St 1200, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Primary total knee; Cement; Adhesion; Bonding; Viscosity; Application time; Coat implant; Surface; CEMENT-IMPLANT INTERFACE; BONE-CEMENT; UNITED-STATES; TIBIAL TRAYS; ARTHROPLASTY; SURVIVAL; FAILURE; HIP;
D O I
10.1186/s40634-020-00243-9
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Implant surface integrity and cement bonding are assumed to be sufficient in primary total knee replacements to stabilize implants for extended wear without concerns over delamination and loosening. Yet there exists a significant rate of aseptic loosening where failure at implant cement interface occurs. The aim of this study is to look at specific aspects leading to aseptic loosening of the total knee replacement, where cement adhesion to the implant results in the lowest pull off strength. Methods Virgin ceramic coated and uncoated chrome cobalt tibial trays were used in a pull off study using differing viscosities of cement at varied time intervals to compare which combination is strongest compared to which is least resistant to pull off testing. Results Low viscosity cement had a 44% (5.9 kg verses 3.3 kg, p < 0.001) higher pull-off strength compared to high viscosity cement. Coated implants had a 30% (3.9 kg verses 5.5 kg, p = 0.037) lower pull-off strength compared to non-coated. Testing measures were limited to cement utilization less than 5 minutes due to the poor adhesion of the dowels beyond this time. Finally, there was a significant difference in adhesion properties between brand names when utilizing low viscosity cement on the non-coated trays (10.34 kg for Simplex verses 4.87 for Palacos, p = 0.021). Conclusion There are differences in adhesion properties between cement vendors, prompting significant concerns over the use of coated implants with particular cement types. Use of low viscosity cement on non-coated surfaces in the early liquid phase of cement curing was found to produce the best chance for adequate adhesion. This study demonstrates that there is variation in the adhesive properties of implants utilized in total knee replacements, and that the orthopedic community should consider not only the implant, cement, and curing time individually, but the overall integrity conferred from the combination of all of these variables.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Increased Long-Term Survival of Posterior Cruciate-Retaining Versus Posterior Cruciate-Stabilizing Total Knee Replacements [J].
Abdel, Matthew P. ;
Morrey, Mark E. ;
Jensen, Matthew R. ;
Morrey, Bernard E. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2011, 93A (22) :2072-2078
[2]  
ASTM, 2015, F308715 ASTM
[3]   Reason for Revision Influences Early Patient Outcomes After Aseptic Knee Revision [J].
Baker, Paul ;
Cowling, Paul ;
Kurtz, Steven ;
Jameson, Simon ;
Gregg, Paul ;
Deehan, David .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2012, 470 (08) :2244-2252
[4]  
Bergschmidt P., 2013, THESIS ROSTOCK U
[5]   Durability of a Cruciate-retaining TKA With Modular Tibial Trays at 20 Years [J].
Callaghan, John J. ;
Beckert, Mitchell W. ;
Hennessy, David W. ;
Goetz, Devon D. ;
Kelley, Scott S. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2013, 471 (01) :109-117
[6]   A Novel Percentage-Based System for Determining Aseptic Loosening of Total Knee Arthroplasty Tibial Components [J].
Chalmers, Brian P. ;
Sculco, Peter K. ;
Fehring, Keith A. ;
Trousdale, Robert T. ;
Taunton, Michael J. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (07) :2274-2278
[7]   Influence of time in-situ and implant type on fixation strength of cemented tibial trays - A post mortem retrieval analysis [J].
de Uhlenbrock, Anne Gebert ;
Pueschel, Vesna ;
Pueschel, Klaus ;
Morlock, Michael M. ;
Bishop, Nicholas E. .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2012, 27 (09) :929-935
[8]   Surface pretreatments for medical application of adhesion [J].
Erli, Hans J. ;
Marx, Rudolf ;
Paar, Othmar ;
Niethard, Fritz U. ;
Weber, Michael ;
Wirtz, Dieter C. .
BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING ONLINE, 2003, 2 (1)
[9]   Tibial Implant Fixation Behavior in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Study With Five Different Bone Cements [J].
Grupp, Thomas M. ;
Schilling, Christoph ;
Schwiesau, Jens ;
Pfaff, Andreas ;
Altermann, Brigitte ;
Mihalko, William M. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 35 (02) :579-587
[10]   Dealing with the predicted increase in demand for revision total knee arthroplasty CHALLENGES, RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES [J].
Hamilton, D. F. ;
Howie, C. R. ;
Burnett, R. ;
Simpson, A. H. R. W. ;
Patton, J. T. .
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2015, 97B (06) :723-728