Development of Perceived Complex Problem-Solving Instrument in Domain of Complex Systems

被引:0
作者
Nagahi, Morteza [1 ]
Maddah, Alieh [2 ]
Jaradat, Raed [1 ]
Mohammadi, Mohammad [2 ]
机构
[1] Mississippi State Univ, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Mississippi State, MS 39762 USA
[2] Islamic Azad Univ, Humanities Fac, Dept Management, Birjand Branch, Birjand 9717711111, Iran
来源
SYSTEMS | 2021年 / 9卷 / 03期
关键词
complex problem-solving; systems thinking; systems thinking skills/preferences; perceived complex problem-solving instrument; complex systems; exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis; scale development; SEM; DECISION-MAKING; EMPIRICAL VALIDATION; THINKING; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.3390/systems9030051
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The ability to solve modern complex systems becomes a necessity of the 21st century. The purpose of this study is the development of an instrument that measures an individual's perception toward solving complex problems. Based on literature and definitions, an instrument with four stages named perceived complex problem-solving (PCPS) was designed through exploratory and confirmatory stages. The instrument is validated and scaled through different models, and the final model is discussed. After completing validation and scale development of the PCPS instrument, the final model of the PCPS instrument was introduced to resolve the gap in the literature. The final model of the PCPS instrument is able to find and quantify the degree of perception an individual holds in dealing with complex problems and can be utilized in different settings and environments. Further research about the relationship between Systems Thinking and CPS revealed individuals with a high level of systems thinking have a better understanding of the characteristics of complex problems and so better perception of CPS.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Adoption of Complex Problem-Solving Practices and Its Impact in Companies' Ability to Address Strategic Challenges
    Loureiro J.
    Pereira L.F.
    IEEE Engineering Management Review, 2024, 52 (03): : 54 - 71
  • [42] Students’ Complex Problem Solving Profiles
    Michela Gnaldi
    Silvia Bacci
    Thiemo Kunze
    Samuel Greiff
    Psychometrika, 2020, 85 : 469 - 501
  • [43] Complex Problem Solving: What It Is and What It Is Not
    Doerner, Dietrich
    Funke, Joachim
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [44] The role of planning in complex problem solving
    Eichmann, Beate
    Goldhammer, Frank
    Greiff, Samuel
    Pucite, Liene
    Naumann, Johannes
    COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2019, 128 : 1 - 12
  • [45] Students' Complex Problem Solving Profiles
    Gnaldi, Michela
    Bacci, Silvia
    Kunze, Thiemo
    Greiff, Samuel
    PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2020, 85 (02) : 469 - 501
  • [46] Complex problem solving in the cultural context
    Badke-Schaub, P
    Strohschneider, S
    TRAVAIL HUMAIN, 1998, 61 (01): : 1 - 28
  • [47] Development and Validation of a Game-Based Assessment for Complex Problem Solving
    Li, Jian
    Li, Yi Ming
    Xing, Yun-Xuan
    Zhang, Bo
    Tang, Yun
    Drasgow, Fritz
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENCE, 2025, 13 (01)
  • [48] The Development of Complex Problem Solving in Adolescence: A Latent Growth Curve Analysis
    Frischkorn, Gidon T.
    Greiff, Samuel
    Wuestenberg, Sascha
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 106 (04) : 1007 - 1020
  • [49] Unsuccessful and successful complex problem solvers - A log file analysis of complex problem solving strategies across multiple tasks
    Nicolay, Bjorn
    Krieger, Florian
    Kuhn, Jorg-Tobias
    Graesser, Arthur C.
    Ifenthaler, Dirk
    Baker, Ryan
    Greiff, Samuel
    INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 101
  • [50] A Pilot Study for Measuring Complex Problem-Solving in Jordan: Feasibility, Construct Validity, and Behavior Pattern Analyses
    Alrababah, Saleh Ahmad
    Wu, Hao
    Molnar, Gyongyver
    SAGE OPEN, 2024, 14 (02):