Adaptive Empathy: Empathic Response Selection as a Dynamic, Feedback-Based Learning Process

被引:17
作者
Arbel, Elena Kozakevich [1 ]
Shamay-Tsoory, Simone G. [1 ,2 ]
Hertz, Uri [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Haifa, Dept Psychol, Haifa, Israel
[2] Integrated Brain & Behav Res Ctr, Haifa, Israel
[3] Univ Haifa, Dept Cognit Sci, Haifa, Israel
基金
以色列科学基金会;
关键词
empathy; cognitive empathy; online simulation; social cognition; learning; reward; decision-making; EMOTION-REGULATION; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; NEURAL BASIS; NEUROSCIENCE; MECHANISMS; INFORMATION; ACCURACY; PITFALLS; BEHAVIOR; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyt.2021.706474
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Empathy allows us to respond to the emotional state of another person. Considering that an empathic interaction may last beyond the initial response, learning mechanisms may be involved in dynamic adaptation of the reaction to the changing emotional state of the other person. However, traditionally, empathy is assessed through sets of isolated reactions to another's distress. Here we address this gap by focusing on adaptive empathy, defined as the ability to learn and adjust one's empathic responses based on feedback. For this purpose, we designed a novel paradigm of associative learning in which participants chose one of two empathic strategies (reappraisal or distraction) to attenuate the distress of a target person, where one strategy had a higher probability of relieving distress. After each choice, participants received feedback about the success of their chosen strategy in relieving the target person's distress, which they could use to inform their future decisions. The results show that the participants made more accurate choices in the adaptive empathy condition than in a non-social control condition, pointing to an advantage for learning from social feedback. We found a correlation between adaptive empathy and a trait measure of cognitive empathy. These findings indicate that the ability to learn about the effectiveness of empathic responses may benefit from incorporating mentalizing abilities. Our findings provide a lab-based model for studying adaptive empathy and point to the potential contribution of learning theory to enhancing our understanding of the dynamic nature of empathy.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 69 条
[51]   The QCAE: A Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy [J].
Reniers, Renate L. E. P. ;
Corcoran, Rhiannon ;
Drake, Richard ;
Shryane, Nick M. ;
Voellm, Birgit A. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2011, 93 (01) :84-95
[52]   Empathizers and systemizers process social information differently [J].
Riekki, Tapani ;
Svedholm-Hakkinen, Annika M. ;
Lindeman, Marjaana .
SOCIAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 13 (05) :616-627
[53]   People thinking about thinking people - The role of the temporo-parietal junction in "theory of mind" [J].
Saxe, R ;
Kanwisher, N .
NEUROIMAGE, 2003, 19 (04) :1835-1842
[54]   Impairment in cognitive and affective empathy in patients with brain lesions: Anatomical and cognitive correlates [J].
Shamay-Tsoory, SG ;
Tomer, R ;
Goldsher, D ;
Berger, BD ;
Aharon-Peretz, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 26 (08) :1113-1127
[55]   The Neural Bases for Empathy [J].
Shamay-Tsoory, Simone G. .
NEUROSCIENTIST, 2011, 17 (01) :18-24
[56]   Two systems for empathy: a double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal lesions [J].
Shamay-Tsoory, Simone G. ;
Aharon-Peretz, Judith ;
Perry, Daniella .
BRAIN, 2009, 132 :617-627
[57]   Emotion-Regulation Choice [J].
Sheppes, Gal ;
Scheibe, Susanne ;
Suri, Gaurav ;
Gross, James J. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 22 (11) :1391-1396
[58]   Beliefs about bad people are volatile [J].
Siegel, Jenifer Z. ;
Mathys, Christoph ;
Rutledge, Robb B. ;
Crockett, Molly J. .
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2018, 2 (10) :750-756
[59]  
Singmann Henrik, 2024, CRAN
[60]   EMPATHIC ACCURACY IN THE INTERACTIONS OF MALE FRIENDS VERSUS MALE STRANGERS [J].
STINSON, L ;
ICKES, W .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 62 (05) :787-797