Convex Time Budgets and Individual Discount Rates in the Long Run

被引:3
作者
Grijalva, Therese C. [1 ]
Lusk, Jayson L. [2 ]
Rong, Rong [3 ]
Shaw, W. Douglass [4 ]
机构
[1] Weber State Univ, 3807 Univ Circle, Ogden, UT 84408 USA
[2] Oklahoma State Univ, 411 Agr Hall, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
[3] Univ Massachusetts, Stockbridge Hall, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[4] Texas A&M Univ, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
Discount rate; Benefit-cost analysis; Convex time budgets; Hyperbolic discounting; Long time horizon; RISK PREFERENCES;
D O I
10.1007/s10640-017-0149-0
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to use experimental data to estimate individual discount rates and test for hyperbolic discounting over a long time horizon. To do this, we employ the convex time budget experimental approach with cash payments over a 20 year time horizon. To date, there are few experimental studies that explore discount rates beyond a 1 year time horizon. Previous experimental studies that focus on short time horizons find high discount rates, which may not be applicable to decisions that affect outcomes in the distant future. Our findings are quite similar to the average rate of 4.9% found by Grijalva et al. (Environ Resour Econ 59:39-63, 2014), who similarly use a 20 year time horizon, but use the multiple price list elicitation method along with payment via government savings bonds. We find annual discounts rates in the range of 1.9-5.5%, depending on the specific model used. We also find evidence for declining discount rates, and that this hyperbolic pattern of behavior is related to the confidence subjects have in receiving distant-future payments.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 277
页数:19
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Eliciting risk and time preferences [J].
Andersen, Steffen ;
Harrison, Glenn W. ;
Lau, Morten I. ;
Rutstrom, E. Elisabet .
ECONOMETRICA, 2008, 76 (03) :583-618
[2]   Discounting behavior: A reconsideration [J].
Andersen, Steffen ;
Harrison, Glenn W. ;
Lau, Morten I. ;
Rutstroem, E. Elisabet .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2014, 71 :15-33
[3]   Risk Preferences Are Not Time Preferences: Reply [J].
Andreoni, James ;
Sprenger, Charles .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2015, 105 (07) :2287-2293
[4]   Measuring time preferences: A comparison of experimental methods [J].
Andreoni, James ;
Kuhn, Michael A. ;
Sprenger, Charles .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2015, 116 :451-464
[5]   Estimating Time Preferences from Convex Budgets [J].
Andreoni, James ;
Sprenger, Charles .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (07) :3333-3356
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1987, The effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value
[7]   Should Governments Use a Declining Discount Rate in Project Analysis? [J].
Arrow, Kenneth J. ;
Cropper, Maureen L. ;
Gollier, Christian ;
Groom, Ben ;
Heal, Geoffrey M. ;
Newell, Richard G. ;
Nordhaus, William D. ;
Pindyck, Robert S. ;
Pizer, William A. ;
Portney, Paul R. ;
Sterner, Thomas ;
Tol, Richard S. J. ;
Weitzman, Martin L. .
REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2014, 8 (02) :145-163
[8]   Discounting and distributional considerations in the context of global warming [J].
Azar, C ;
Sterner, T .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 19 (02) :169-184
[9]   External and internal consistency of choices made in convex time budgets [J].
Chakraborty, Anujit ;
Calford, Evan M. ;
Fenig, Guidon ;
Halevy, Yoram .
EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 20 (03) :687-706
[10]   Comment on "Risk Preferences Are Not Time Preferences": On the Elicitation of Time Preference under Conditions of Risk [J].
Cheung, Stephen L. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2015, 105 (07) :2242-2260