The cost of positron emission tomography in six United States Veterans Affairs Hospitals and two Academic Medical Centers

被引:44
作者
Berger, M
Gould, MK
Barnett, PG
机构
[1] VA Palo Alto Hlth Care Syst, Menlo Pk, CA 94025 USA
[2] VA HSR&D Hlth Econ Resource Ctr, VA Cooperat Studies Program Coordinating Ctr, Menlo Pk, CA 94025 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.181.2.1810359
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. Positron emission tomography (PET) is a high-cost imaging tool primarily used in oncology, cardiology, and neuropsychiatry. Accurate estimates of the cost of PET are needed to assess its cost effectiveness and determine the appropriate role for this modality in clinical applications. We performed a survey-based cost analysis of PET with FDG by estimating direct, indirect, and capital costs from eight PET centers. A breakdown of the operational budget of PET centers and FDG-compounding facilities is presented along with the costs per scan. Differences in costs between sites that purchase FDG and those that manufacture FDG are also examined. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We sent surveys to managers of eight Veterans Affairs and two non-Veterans Affairs PET scanning and FDG-compounding facilities. The survey included questions about service volume and the direct costs of equipment, personnel, space, supplies, and repairs needed for FDG compounding and PET scanning and interpretation. We estimated the indirect costs associated with FDG compounding, PET scanning, and PET interpretation. RESULTS. Of the eight sites that responded to our survey, three sites manufacture FDG on-site, three sites purchase FDG, and two sites do both. The total mean cost per scan using manufactured FDG is $1885, and it is $1898 using purchased FDG. CONCLUSION. PET is expensive. The cost is similar when FDG is manufactured or purchased. Because both PET and cyclotron facilities have high fixed costs, increasing the number of scans obtained and the number of FDG doses manufactured may lead to a decrease in unit costs.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 365
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
BARNETT P, 2003, VA HLTH EC RES CTR R, V5, P1
[2]  
BARNETT P, 1996, ACAD MED, V71, P42
[3]   POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY - A FINANCIAL AND OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS [J].
CONTI, PS ;
KEPPLER, JS ;
HALLS, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 162 (06) :1279-1286
[4]   The current status of clinical PET imaging [J].
Cook, GJR ;
Maisey, MN .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1996, 51 (09) :603-613
[5]   The clinical use of PET - where are we now? [J].
Cook, GJR .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2001, 74 (881) :399-401
[6]   PET-FDG IMAGING AND TRANSTHORACIC NEEDLE LUNG ASPIRATION BIOPSY IN EVALUATION OF PULMONARY-LESIONS - A COMPARATIVE RISK-BENEFIT ANALYSIS [J].
DEWAN, NA ;
REEB, SD ;
GUPTA, NC ;
GOBAR, LS ;
SCOTT, WJ .
CHEST, 1995, 108 (02) :441-446
[7]   Cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET for the management of potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer: priority for a PET-based strategy after nodal-negative CT results [J].
Dietlein, M ;
Weber, K ;
Gandjour, A ;
Moka, D ;
Theissen, P ;
Lauterbach, KW ;
Schicha, H .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2000, 27 (11) :1598-1609
[8]   Cost-effectiveness of FDG-PET for the management of solitary pulmonary nodules: a decision analysis based on cost reimbursement in Germany [J].
Dietlein, M ;
Weber, K ;
Gandjour, A ;
Moka, D ;
Theissen, P ;
Lauterbach, KW ;
Schicha, H .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2000, 27 (10) :1441-1456
[9]  
*ECRI HLTH TECHN A, 1998, EX BRIEF
[10]   COST ANALYSES OF POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY FOR CLINICAL USE [J].
EVENS, RG ;
SIEGEL, BA ;
WELCH, MJ ;
TERPOGOSSIAN, MM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1983, 141 (05) :1073-1076