Comparing self-management of oral anticoagulant therapy with clinic management -: A randomized trial

被引:139
作者
Menéndez-Jándula, B
Souto, JC
Oliver, A
Montserrat, I
Quintana, M
Glch, I
Bonfill, X
Fontcuberta, J
机构
[1] Hosp Santa Creu & Sant Pau, Unitat Hemostasia & Trombosi, Barcelona 08025, Spain
[2] Fdn Puigvert, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-142-1-200501040-00006
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: control of oral anticoagulant treatment has been reported to be suboptimal, but previous studies suggest that patient self-management improves control. Objective: To compare the quality of control and the clinical outcomes of oral anticoagulant treatment in self-managed patients versus patients following conventional management. Design: Randomized, controlled trial. Setting: University-affiliated hospital in Spain. Patients: 737 patients with indications for anticoagulant treatment. Intervention: The self-management group (n = 368) received simple instructions for using a portable coagulometer weekly and self-adjusting treatment dose. The conventional management group (n = 369) received usual care in an anticoagulation clinic (monthly measurement and control of international normalized ratio [INR], managed by hematologists). Measurements: Percentage of INR values within the target range and major related complications. Results: The median follow-up period was 11.8 months (range, 0.3 to 16.9 months). The unadjusted percentages of in-range INRs were 58.6% in the self-management group and 55.6% in the conventional management group (difference, 3.0 percentage points [95% CI, 0.4 to 5.4 percentage points]). Twenty-seven patients (7.3%) in the conventional management group and 8 (2.2%) in the self-management group had major complications related to anticoagulant treatment. The unadjusted risk difference for major complications between groups was 5.1 percentage points (exact 95% CI, 1.7 to 8.5 percentage points). Fewer patients had minor hemorrhages in the self-management group (14.9%) than in the conventional management group (36.4%). Fifteen patients (4.1%) in the conventional management group and 6 (1.6%) in the self-management group died (unadjusted risk difference, 2.5 percentage points [exact 95% CI, 0.0 to 5.1 percentage points]). Limitations: The trial was performed at only 1 center and was not blinded. The dropout rate in the intervention group was 21%. Conclusions: Compared with conventional management by an anticoagulation clinic, self-management of oral anticoagulant treatment achieved a similar level of control. Of note, major complications and minor hemorrhages were less common in the self-management group.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [31] Self-management of oral anticoagulation:: long-term results
    Sawicki, PT
    Gläser, B
    Kleespies, C
    Stubbe, J
    Schmitz, N
    Kaiser, T
    Didjurgeit, U
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 254 (05) : 515 - 516
  • [32] Self-managed anticoagulation: Results from a two-year prospective randomized trial with heart valve patients
    Sidhu, P
    O'Kane, HO
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2001, 72 (05) : 1523 - 1527
  • [33] Systematic review of studies of self-management of oral anticoagulation
    Siebenhofer, A
    Berghold, A
    Sawicki, PT
    [J]. THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2004, 91 (02) : 225 - 232
  • [34] Cost-effectiveness of self-managed anticoagulant therapy in Germany
    Taborski, U
    Wittstamm, FJ
    Bernardo, A
    [J]. SEMINARS IN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS, 1999, 25 (01) : 103 - 107
  • [35] Watzke HH, 2000, THROMB HAEMOSTASIS, V83, P661
  • [36] HOME PROTHROMBIN TIME MONITORING AFTER THE INITIATION OF WARFARIN THERAPY - A RANDOMIZED, PROSPECTIVE-STUDY
    WHITE, RH
    MCCURDY, SA
    VONMARENSDORFF, H
    WOODRUFF, DE
    LEFTGOFF, L
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1989, 111 (09) : 730 - 737