Quality control guidelines for factory applied structural silicone glazing

被引:0
作者
Carbary, LD [1 ]
Gustafson, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Dow Corning Corp, Midland, MI 48686 USA
来源
DURABILITY OF BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION SEALANTS AND ADHESIVES | 2004年 / 1453卷
关键词
silicone structural glazing; structural silicone; remedial glazing; quality assurance; testing;
D O I
10.1520/STP12554S
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Factory applied structural silicone application has become the preferred method of structural silicone glazing and panel attachment within the curtainwall industry. This preference is due to the fact that the factory environment can be environmentally controlled, quality control practices are easier implemented, and supervision is readily available compared to the field environment. This paper describes the proper methods for quality control learned by the authors over the past 15 years and a description of the benefits. Suggested architectural submittals regarding quality control guidelines for the surface preparation, structural silicone application, adhesion verification, and unit deglazing are discussed. Reporting this data in a logical fashion is essential so that a review by consultants, inspectors and/or building officials can be done. Guidelines for submitting this data are included. Interpretation of the data is a key part of this paper because the responsible parties must have a clear set of data to review to ensure the building owner of a successful project. Included in this paper is a unique test method utilizing a portable tensile testing device to quantify accurately the structural silicone strength to verify that the installed sealant meets the minimum requirements set forth by ASTM Standard Specification for Structural Silicone Sealants (C1184-00). This quick method of testing deglazed panels can provide accurate tensile strength of the installed silicone in 24-48 hours after deglazing without destroying the curtainwall panel assembly. Immediately after testing the installed structural silicone, the curtainwall panel can be reglazed. This unique method is beneficial because the alternative pressure testing of curtainwall units to the point where the structural silicone would reach the requirements set forth in ASTM C 1184 would substantially overload and destroy the curtainwall panel assembly. Suggested specification requirements regarding the type and frequency of quality control tests are given. When these requirements are followed, a reduction in the risk of failure with structural silicone glazed projects is obtained. Guidelines that are presented are state of the art, in concert with ASTM Standard Guide for Structural Sealant Glazing (C1401-02) and will ensure long-term performance of structural silicone glazed curtainwalls.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 55
页数:11
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Structural silicone glazing: In-service reliability evaluation [J].
Schwartz, TA ;
Zarghamee, MS ;
Kan, FW .
SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF BUILDING SEALS, SEALANTS, GLAZING, AND WATERPROOFING: SIXTH VOLUME, 1996, :3-14
[2]   Structural silicone glazing: optimizing future designs based on historical performances [J].
Carbary, Lawrence D. ;
Kimberlain, Jon H. .
INTELLIGENT BUILDINGS INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 12 (03) :169-179
[3]   Development of a practical method to evaluate the fatigue properties of structural silicone glazing adhesives [J].
Carbary, Lawrence D. ;
Bull, Errol D. ;
Mishra, Steve S. .
DURABILITY OF BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION SEALANTS AND ADHESIVES: 2ND VOLUME, 2006, 1488 :53-+
[4]   Development of a practical method to evaluate the fatigue properties of structural silicone glazing adhesives [J].
Dow Corning Corporation, P.O. Box 994, Midland. MI 48686-0994, United States ;
不详 ;
不详 .
J. ASTM Int., 2007, 1
[5]   Guidelines for the Quality Control of Population Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Analyses: an Industry Perspective [J].
P. L. Bonate ;
A. Strougo ;
A. Desai ;
M. Roy ;
A. Yassen ;
J. S. van der Walt ;
A. Kaibara ;
S. Tannenbaum .
The AAPS Journal, 2012, 14 :749-758
[6]   Production, review, and impact of technical quality control guidelines in a national context [J].
Nielsen, Michelle K. ;
Malkoske, Kyle E. ;
Brown, Erika ;
Diamond, Kevin ;
Freniere, Normand ;
Grant, John ;
Pomerleau-Dalcourt, Natalie ;
Schella, Jason ;
Schreiner, L. John ;
Tantot, Laurent ;
Villarreal-Barajas, J. Eduardo ;
Bissonnette, Jean-Pierre .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 17 (06) :3-15
[7]   COMP report: CPQR technical quality control guidelines for radiation treatment centers [J].
Malkoske, Kyle E. ;
Nielsen, Michelle K. ;
Tantot, Laurent ;
Pomerleau-Dalcourt, Natalie ;
Milette, Marie-Pierre ;
Diamond, Kevin R. ;
Freniere, Normand ;
Bertrand, Marie-Joelle ;
Villarreal-Barajas, J. Eduardo ;
Sasaki, David K. ;
Schella, Jason ;
Grant, John ;
Schreiner, L. John ;
Bissonnette, Jean-Pierre .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 19 (02) :44-47
[8]   Guidelines for the Quality Control of Population Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Analyses: an Industry Perspective [J].
Bonate, P. L. ;
Strougo, A. ;
Desai, A. ;
Roy, M. ;
Yassen, A. ;
van der Walt, J. S. ;
Kaibara, A. ;
Tannenbaum, S. .
AAPS JOURNAL, 2012, 14 (04) :749-758
[9]   COMP report: CPQR technical quality control guidelines for major dosimetry equipment [J].
Kamta, Gerard Lagmago .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 19 (04) :18-25
[10]   French guidelines for mass-screening pap smears internal quality control [J].
Cochand-Priollet, B ;
Anger, E ;
Baron, V ;
Cartier, I ;
Dorne, H ;
Dubois-Gordeff, A ;
Hassoun, J ;
Jouannelle, A ;
Labbe, S ;
Locquet, D ;
Marsan, C ;
Martin, E ;
Michiels-Marzais, D ;
Molinie, V ;
Mottot, C ;
Mueller, B ;
Vacher-Lavenu, MC ;
Vincent, S ;
Vuong, PN .
ANNALES DE PATHOLOGIE, 1998, 18 (03) :221-226