COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FEATURE SPACE PROJECTION METHODS FOR HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGE CLASSIFICATION

被引:1
作者
Li, Fan [1 ]
Wong, Alexander [1 ]
Clausi, David A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Dept Syst Design Engn, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
来源
2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS) | 2014年
关键词
Feature space projection; dimension reduction; hyperspectral imagery(HSI); supervised classification; DIMENSIONALITY REDUCTION;
D O I
10.1109/IGARSS.2014.6947221
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Feature space projection, or feature projection is an active research topic in machine learning. Some projection methods have been used in remote sensing for dimension reduction, especially for hyperspectral data due to high dimensionality. Projection methods can improve the performance of classifiers susceptible to the Hughes phenomenon. However, the effect of feature projection for more advanced classifiers has not been well-studied, and there are few studies comparing projection methods for hyperspectral image classification. A comprehensive study has been performed on the effect of feature projection for classification using both reduced and full dimensions. The performance of six feature projection methods (PCA, LLE, LDA, LFDA, LMNN, and SPCA) using three classifiers has been explored on three hyperspectral data sets. Results show that the performance of feature projection methods on different classifiers are mainly consistent for different data sets. LFDA achieves the best overall performance considering all data sets and all classifiers.
引用
收藏
页码:3438 / 3441
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], P ADV NEURAL INFORM
[2]   Supervised principal component analysis: Visualization, classification and regression on subspaces and submanifolds [J].
Barshan, Elnaz ;
Ghodsi, Ali ;
Azimifar, Zohreh ;
Jahromi, Mansoor Zolghadri .
PATTERN RECOGNITION, 2011, 44 (07) :1357-1371
[3]  
Bingham E., 2001, KDD-2001. Proceedings of the Seventh ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, P245, DOI 10.1145/502512.502546
[4]   Evaluation and comparison of dimensionality reduction methods and band selection [J].
Chen, Guangyi ;
Qian, Shen-En .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2008, 34 (01) :26-32
[5]   On the impact of PCA dimension reduction for hyperspectral detection of difficult targets [J].
Farrell, MD ;
Mersereau, RM .
IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2005, 2 (02) :192-195
[6]   Hyperspectral data analysis and supervised feature reduction via projection pursuit [J].
Jimenez, LO ;
Landgrebe, DA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1999, 37 (06) :2653-2667
[7]   Locality-Preserving Dimensionality Reduction and Classification for Hyperspectral Image Analysis [J].
Li, Wei ;
Prasad, Saurabh ;
Fowler, James E. ;
Bruce, Lori Mann .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2012, 50 (04) :1185-1198
[8]  
Maaten L.V.D., 2009, J Mach Learn Res, DOI DOI 10.1080/13506280444000102
[9]   Recent advances in techniques for hyperspectral image processing [J].
Plaza, Antonio ;
Benediktsson, Jon Atli ;
Boardman, Joseph W. ;
Brazile, Jason ;
Bruzzone, Lorenzo ;
Camps-Valls, Gustavo ;
Chanussot, Jocelyn ;
Fauvel, Mathieu ;
Gamba, Paolo ;
Gualtieri, Anthony ;
Marconcini, Mattia ;
Tilton, James C. ;
Trianni, Giovanna .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2009, 113 :S110-S122
[10]   Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding [J].
Roweis, ST ;
Saul, LK .
SCIENCE, 2000, 290 (5500) :2323-+