Exploring trade-offs among the multiple benefits of green-blue-grey infrastructure for urban flood mitigation

被引:156
作者
Alves, Alida [1 ,2 ]
Vojinovic, Zoran [1 ]
Kapelan, Zoran [3 ,4 ]
Sanchez, Arlex [1 ]
Gersonius, Berry [5 ]
机构
[1] IHE Delft, Dept Environm Engn & Water Technol, Westvest 7, NL-2611 AX Delft, Netherlands
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Sci Appl, Dept Biotechnol, Delft, Netherlands
[3] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Civil Engn & Geosci, Dept Water Management, Delft, Netherlands
[4] Univ Exeter, Coll Engn, Ctr Water Syst, Exeter, Devon, England
[5] ResilienServices, Pootstr 120, NL-2613 PN Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Nature based solutions; Hybrid drainage infrastructure; Flood damage reduction; Multiple benefits; Multi-objective optimisation; STORMWATER MANAGEMENT; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; CO-BENEFITS; RISK; ECOSYSTEM; STAKEHOLDERS; CHALLENGES; ALGORITHM; SELECTION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134980
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Climate change is presenting one of the main challenges to our planet. In parallel, all regions of the world are projected to urbanise further. Consequently, sustainable development challenges will be increasingly concentrated in cities. A resulting impact is the increment of expected urban flood risk in many areas around the globe. Adaptation to climate change is an opportunity to improve urban conditions through the implementation of green-blue infrastructures, which provide multiple benefits besides flood mitigation. However, this is not an easy task since urban drainage systems are complex structures. This work focuses on a method to analyse the trade-offs when different benefits are pursued in stormwater infrastructure planning. A hydrodynamic model was coupled with an evolutionary optimisation algorithm to evaluate different green-blue-grey measures combinations. This evaluation includes flood mitigation as well as the enhancement of co-benefits. We confirmed optimisation as a helpful decision-making tool to visualise trade-offs among flood management strategies. Our results show that considering co-benefits enhancement as an objective boosts the selection of green-blue infrastructure. However, flood mitigation effectiveness can be diminished when extra benefits are pursued. Finally, we proved that combining green-blue-grey measures is particularly important in urban spaces when several benefits are considered simultaneously. (C) 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Cool surfaces and shade trees to reduce energy use and improve air quality in urban areas [J].
Akbari, H ;
Pomerantz, M ;
Taha, H .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2001, 70 (03) :295-310
[2]   Long-Term Hydraulic Performance of Porous Asphalt Pavements in Northern Sweden [J].
Al-Rubaei, Ahmed Mohammed ;
Stenglein, Anna Lena ;
Viklander, Maria ;
Blecken, Godecke-Tobias .
JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2013, 139 (06) :499-505
[3]   Assessing the Co-Benefits of green-blue-grey infrastructure for sustainable urban flood risk management [J].
Alves, Alida ;
Gersonius, Berry ;
Kapelan, Zoran ;
Vojinovic, Zoran ;
Sanchez, Arlex .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 239 :244-254
[4]   Multi-criteria Approach for Selection of Green and Grey Infrastructure to Reduce Flood Risk and Increase CO-benefits [J].
Alves, Alida ;
Gersonius, Berry ;
Sanchez, Arlex ;
Vojinovic, Zoran ;
Kapelan, Zoran .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2018, 32 (07) :2505-2522
[5]   Combining Co-Benefits and Stakeholders Perceptions into Green Infrastructure Selection for Flood Risk Reduction [J].
Alves, Alida ;
Gomez, Jose Patino ;
Vojinovic, Zoran ;
Sanchez, Arlex ;
Weesakul, Sutat .
ENVIRONMENTS, 2018, 5 (02) :1-23
[6]   Evolutionary and Holistic Assessment of Green-Grey Infrastructure for CSO Reduction [J].
Alves, Alida ;
Sanchez, Arlex ;
Vojinovic, Zoran ;
Seyoum, Solomon ;
Babel, Mukand ;
Brdjanovic, Damir .
WATER, 2016, 8 (09)
[7]  
[Anonymous], EC CURACAO SINT MAAR
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2012, FLOOD RISK RED INN T
[9]  
[Anonymous], STORRS WATER MANAGEM
[10]  
[Anonymous], NATURE BASEDSOLUTION