Reliability-based assessment of existing masonry arch railway bridges

被引:42
作者
Moreira, Vicente N. [1 ]
Fernandes, Joao [1 ]
Matos, Jose C. [1 ]
Oliveira, Daniel V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minho, Dept Civil Engn, ISISE, Campus Azurem, P-4800058 Guimaraes, Portugal
关键词
Masonry arch bridges; Safety assessment; Statistical uncertainty; Probabilistic assessment; Limit analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.030
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A great number of masonry arch bridges dates back to past centuries, being preserved by society due to their historical and still economic importance. Thereby, adequate preservation measures are required. Regarding masonry arch bridge's structural condition, it is relevant to consider its age, and consequently deterioration, and the fact that these bridges are submitted to loads higher than those for which they were conceived, being imperative to assess their structural performance. Regarding safety assessment requirements, there are different reliability levels, whose objectives are to analyse the ultimate load carrying capacity and the serviceability performance. This paper presents and discusses a framework that allows to determine the ultimate load-carrying capacity (Ultimate Limit State) of masonry arch bridges, using limit analysis and probabilistic approaches. Geometric and material data and load characterization, as well as inherent uncertainties will be also introduced. In order to determine the ultimate load-carrying capacity, the plastic theory will be employed, namely the limit analysis theorem, which is based on kinematic mechanisms. Since one of the main drawbacks of a probabilistic analysis is the required high computational resources, a sensitivity analysis is incorporated in order to reduce the analysis time. The presented framework is validated with an application to a set of existing Portuguese railway masonry arch bridges. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:544 / 554
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reliability-based seismic performance of masonry arch bridges
    Gonen, Semih
    Soyoz, Serdar
    STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2022, 18 (12) : 1658 - 1673
  • [2] Reliability-based structural assessment of historical masonry arch bridges: The case study of Cernadela bridge
    Bouzas, O.
    Conde, B.
    Matos, J. C.
    Solla, M.
    Cabaleiro, M.
    CASE STUDIES IN CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, 2023, 18
  • [3] Algorithm to Estimate the Capacity Reserve of Existing Masonry Arch Railway Bridges
    Brighenti, Francesca
    Possidente, Luca
    Zonta, Daniele
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (02):
  • [4] Reliability-Based Assessment of a Masonry Arch Bridge Considering Random Stereotomy
    Fadel, Mohamed Taha
    Rguig, Mustapha
    El Aroussi, Mohamed
    Saadane, Rachid
    PRACTICE PERIODICAL ON STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 28 (04)
  • [5] Simplified seismic assessment of railway masonry arch bridges by limit analysis
    da Porto, Francesca
    Tecchio, Giovanni
    Zampieri, Paolo
    Modena, Claudio
    Prota, Andrea
    STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2016, 12 (05) : 567 - 591
  • [6] Dynamic amplification in masonry arch railway bridges
    Bozyigit, Baran
    Acikgoz, Sinan
    STRUCTURES, 2022, 45 : 1717 - 1728
  • [7] Seismic assessment of masonry arch bridges
    Pela, Luca
    Aprile, Alessandra
    Benedetti, Andrea
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2009, 31 (08) : 1777 - 1788
  • [8] Analytical fragility curves for displacement-based scour assessment of masonry arch bridges
    George, Jofin
    Menon, Arun
    STRUCTURES, 2022, 46 : 172 - 185
  • [9] Masonry arch bridges in the Italian railway engineering experience: State of condition, static reliability, seismic verification and retrofit strategies
    Modena, C.
    Tecchio, G.
    da Porto, F.
    MAINTENANCE, MONITORING, SAFETY, RISK AND RESILIENCE OF BRIDGES AND BRIDGE NETWORKS, 2016, : 103 - 119
  • [10] Safety Assessment of Masonry Arch Bridges Considering the Fracturing Benefit
    Accornero, Federico
    Lacidogna, Giuseppe
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (10):