Subgrid modelling for two-dimensional turbulence using neural networks

被引:218
作者
Maulik, R. [1 ]
San, O. [1 ]
Rasheed, A. [2 ]
Vedula, P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Oklahoma State Univ, Sch Mech & Aerosp Engn, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
[2] SINTEF Digital, CSE Grp Math & Cybernet, N-7465 Trondheim, Norway
[3] Univ Oklahoma, Sch Aerosp & Mech Engn, Norman, OK 73019 USA
关键词
computational methods; quasi-geostrophic flows; turbulence modelling; LARGE-EDDY SIMULATION; DATA-DRIVEN; CONSTANT;
D O I
10.1017/jfm.2018.770
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
In this investigation, a data-driven turbulence closure framework is introduced and deployed for the subgrid modelling of Kraichnan turbulence. The novelty of the proposed method lies in the fact that snapshots from high-fidelity numerical data are used to inform artificial neural networks for predicting the turbulence source term through localized grid-resolved information. In particular, our proposed methodology successfully establishes a map between inputs given by stencils of the vorticity and the streamfunction along with information from two well-known eddy-viscosity kernels. Through this we predict the subgrid vorticity forcing in a temporally and spatially dynamic fashion. Our study is both a priori and a posteriori in nature. In the former, we present an extensive hyper-parameter optimization analysis in addition to learning quantification through probability-density-function-based validation of subgrid predictions. In the latter, we analyse the performance of our framework for flow evolution in a classical decaying two-dimensional turbulence test case in the presence of errors related to temporal and spatial discretization. Statistical assessments in the form of angle-averaged kinetic energy spectra demonstrate the promise of the proposed methodology for subgrid quantity inference. In addition, it is also observed that some measure of a posteriori error must be considered during optimal model selection for greater accuracy. The results in this article thus represent a promising development in the formalization of a framework for generation of heuristic-free turbulence closures from data.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 144
页数:23
相关论文
共 56 条
[31]   Nonlinear aeroelastic reduced order modeling by recurrent neural networks [J].
Mannarino, Andrea ;
Mantegazza, Paolo .
JOURNAL OF FLUIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2014, 48 :103-121
[32]   A dynamic LES scheme for the vorticity transport equation: Formulation and a priori tests [J].
Mansfield, JR ;
Knio, OM ;
Meneveau, C .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1998, 145 (02) :693-730
[33]   Analysis of subgrid-scale torque for large-eddy simulation of turbulence [J].
Marshall, JS ;
Beninati, AL .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2003, 41 (10) :1875-1881
[34]   A neural network approach for the blind deconvolution of turbulent flows [J].
Maulik, R. ;
San, O. .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2017, 831 :151-181
[35]   A stable and scale-aware dynamic modeling framework for subgrid-scale parameterizations of two-dimensional turbulence [J].
Maulik, Romit ;
San, Omer .
COMPUTERS & FLUIDS, 2017, 158 :11-38
[36]   Neural network modeling for near wall turbulent flow [J].
Milano, M ;
Koumoutsakos, P .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2002, 182 (01) :1-26
[37]  
Mohan A. T., 2018, ARXIV
[38]   Theoretically based optimal large-eddy simulation [J].
Moser, Robert D. ;
Malaya, Nicholas P. ;
Chang, Henry ;
Zandonade, Paulo S. ;
Vedula, Prakash ;
Bhattacharya, Amitabh ;
Haselbacher, Andreas .
PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2009, 21 (10)
[39]   A paradigm for data-driven predictive modeling using field inversion and machine learning [J].
Parish, Eric J. ;
Duraisamy, Karthik .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2016, 305 :758-774
[40]   Hybrid forecasting of chaotic processes: Using machine learning in conjunction with a knowledge-based model [J].
Pathak, Jaideep ;
Wikner, Alexander ;
Fussell, Rebeckah ;
Chandra, Sarthak ;
Hunt, Brian R. ;
Girvan, Michelle ;
Ott, Edward .
CHAOS, 2018, 28 (04)