Assessing the Quality of Heritage Education Programs: Construction and Calibration of the Q-Edutage Scale

被引:30
作者
Fontal Merillas, Olaia [1 ]
Garcia Ceballos, Silvia [1 ]
Arias, Benito [2 ]
Arias, Victor B. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valladolid, Fac Educ & Trabajo Social, Dept Didact Expres Mus Plast & Corporal, Valladolid, Spain
[2] Univ Valladolid, Fac Educ & Trabajo Social, Dept Psicol, Valladolid, Spain
[3] Univ Salamanca, Fac Psicol, Dept Evaluac Personalidad & Tratamiento Psicol, Salamanca, Spain
[4] Univ Salamanca, Fac Psicol, Inst Univ Integrac Comunidad INICO, Salamanca, Spain
来源
REVISTA DE PSICODIDACTICA | 2019年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Assessment; Heritage education; Quality; Educational programs; FIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.psicod.2018.07.003
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Improving the assessment of the quality of educational programs is one of the main objectives of research in heritage education. However, we do not have an instrument that is brief, objective and allows the use of a common standard for unbiased quality comparison between different programs. The objective of this study has been to design and develop a tool for the quality assessment of heritage education programs, which maintains an appropriate balance between accuracy and brevity, and can be used both on its own (e.g., for screening purposes when the number of programs to be evaluated is high) and to support broader assessment systems. Relevant quality indicators were identified, according to previous research and evaluations by 17 experts, resulting in 14 quality indicators that were calibrated using Item Response Theory models from the assessment of 330 heritage education programs. The scale was able to discriminate with high precision between various levels of quality (i.e., very low, low, medium, high and very high), provided a good level of information over a wide area of the variable, and produced unbiased scores among different evaluators. The Q-Edutage scale is an relevant addition that contributes to improving the rigour of evaluation and program planning in the field of heritage education. (C) 2018 Universidad de Pais Vasco. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 38
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, ERIC CLEARINGHOUSE A
[2]  
Bangdiwala S., 1987, PROC SAS USERS GROUP, V12, P1083
[3]  
Bolivar C. R., 2013, INSTRUMENTOS TECNICA
[4]   Some new thoughts on conceptualizing perceived service quality: A hierarchical approach [J].
Brady, MK ;
Cronin, JJ .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2001, 65 (03) :34-49
[5]  
Cai L., 2011, IRTPRO WINDOWS COMPU
[6]  
Cai Li., 2011, IRTPRO User's Guide
[7]  
Calaf Masach M. d. R., 2017, Bordon: Revista de Pedagogia, V69, P45, DOI [10.13042/Bordon.2016.42686, DOI 10.13042/BORDON.2016.42686]
[8]   Assessing the Educational Programs in Art Museums linked to the ECPEME Project [J].
Calaf Masach, Roser ;
Gillate, Iratxe ;
Gutierrez Berciano, Sue .
EDUCATIO SIGLO XXI, 2015, 33 (01) :129-150
[9]  
Cobaleda M., 2016, OPCION, V32, P856
[10]  
Cohen JW., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA, DOI 10.4324/9780203771587