Supervisory Control of Multiple Robots: Effects of Imperfect Automation and Individual Differences

被引:80
|
作者
Chen, Jessie Y. C. [1 ]
Barnes, Michael J. [1 ]
机构
[1] USA, Res Lab, Human Res & Engn Directorate, Orlando, FL 32826 USA
关键词
human-robot interaction; supervisory control; intelligent agent; military; imperfect automation; individual differences; spatial ability; attentional control; gaming experience; HUMAN-PERFORMANCE ISSUES; WORKING-MEMORY CAPACITY; CONCURRENT PERFORMANCE; MULTITASKING PERFORMANCE; TASKS; MILITARY; TELEOPERATION; PREDICTORS; ATTENTION; RELIANCE;
D O I
10.1177/0018720811435843
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Objective: A military multitasking environment was simulated to examine the effects of an intelligent agent, RoboLeader, on the performance of robotics operators. Background: The participants' task was to manage a team of ground robots with the assistance of RoboLeader, an intelligent agent capable of coordinating the robots and changing their routes on the basis of battlefield developments. Method: In the first experiment, RoboLeader was perfectly reliable; in the second experiment, RoboLeader's recommendations were manipulated to be either false-alarm prone or miss prone, with a reliability level of either 60% or 90%. The visual density of the targeting environment was manipulated by the presence or absence of friendly soldiers. Results: RoboLeader, when perfectly reliable, was helpful in reducing the overall mission times. The type of RoboLeader imperfection (false-alarm vs. miss prone) affected operators' performance of tasks involving visual scanning (target detection, route editing, and situation awareness). There was a consistent effect of visual density (clutter of the visual scene) for multiple performance measures. Participants' attentional control and video gaming experience affected their overall multitasking performance. In both experiments, participants with greater spatial ability consistently outperformed their low-spatial-ability counterparts in tasks that required effective visual scanning. Conclusion: Intelligent agents, such as RoboLeader, can benefit the overall human-robot teaming performance. However, the effects of type of agent unreliability, tasking requirements, and individual differences have complex effects on human-agent interaction. Application: The current results will facilitate the implementation of robots in military settings and will provide useful data to designs of systems for multirobot control.
引用
收藏
页码:157 / 174
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Individual Differences in Response to Automation: The Five Factor Model of Personality
    Szalma, James L.
    Taylor, Grant S.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED, 2011, 17 (02) : 71 - 96
  • [32] Individual Differences in Attitude Toward Robots Predict Behavior in Human-Robot Interaction
    Hinz, Nina-Alisa
    Ciardo, Francesca
    Wykowska, Agnieszka
    SOCIAL ROBOTICS, ICSR 2019, 2019, 11876 : 64 - 73
  • [33] Assistive Robots in Eldercare and Daily Living: Automation of Individual Services for Senior Citizens
    Mertens, Alexander
    Reiser, Ulrich
    Brenken, Benedikt
    Luedtke, Mathias
    Haegele, Martin
    Verl, Alexander
    Brandl, Christopher
    Schlick, Christopher
    INTELLIGENT ROBOTICS AND APPLICATIONS, PT I: ICIRA 2011, 2011, 7101 : 542 - +
  • [34] Effects of Individual Differences and Situational Features on Age Differences in Mindless Reading
    Shake, Matthew C.
    Shulley, Leah J.
    Soto-Freita, Angelica M.
    JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2016, 71 (05): : 808 - 820
  • [35] The Importance of Conative Factors for Individual Differences in Attention Control
    Unsworth, Nash
    Miller, Ashley L.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2024, 50 (09) : 1361 - 1384
  • [36] A Neurocognitive Psychometrics Account of Individual Differences in Attentional Control
    Schubert, Anna-Lena
    Loeffler, Christoph
    Hagemann, Dirk
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2022, 151 (09) : 2060 - 2082
  • [37] Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity and Attentional Control
    Hiebel, Nina
    Zimmer, Hubert D.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 2015, 69 (01): : 17 - 27
  • [38] Individual differences in the effects of salience and reward on impulse control and action selection
    Schutte, I.
    Schutter, D. J. L. G.
    Kenemans, J. L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 193
  • [39] The effect of age and individual differences in attentional control: A sample case using the Hayling test
    Borella, E.
    Ludwig, C.
    Fagot, D.
    De Ribaupierre, A.
    ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2011, 53 (01) : E75 - E80
  • [40] Predicting controller capacity in supervisory control of multiple UAVs
    Cummings, Mary L.
    Mitchell, Paul J.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 2008, 38 (02): : 451 - 460