Vocabulary abilities of children with Williams syndrome: Strengths, weaknesses, and relation to visuospatial construction ability

被引:44
作者
Mervis, Carolyn B. [1 ]
John, Angela E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH | 2008年 / 51卷 / 04期
关键词
Williams syndrome; intellectual disability; language acquisition; vocabulary; visuospatial construction;
D O I
10.1044/1092-4388(2008/071)
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Purpose: This project was designed to identify relative strengths and weaknesses in vocabulary ability for children with Williams syndrome (WS) and to demonstrate the importance of stringent matching criteria for cross-group comparisons. Method: Children with WS and typically developing (TD) children completed standardized assessments of intellectual and language ability. Children with WS also completed a visuospatial construction ability assessment. Results: Study 1: Concrete and relational vocabulary standard scores were significantly lower for 5- to 7-year-olds with WS than for TD children. Children with WS earned significantly higher standard scores for concrete than for relational vocabulary. When groups were stringently matched for relational vocabulary size, children with WS did not evidence a specific weakness in spatial vocabulary. Study 2: Standard scores for relational vocabulary were similar to those for visuospatial construction ability for 5- to 7-year-olds with WS. Study 3: Nine-to 11-year-olds with WS demonstrated very limited relational vocabulary ability; relational vocabulary ability at 5-7 years was highly correlated with later relational language ability. Conclusions: Concrete vocabulary is a relative strength for children with WS; relational vocabulary ability is very limited and is at about the level of visuospatial construction ability. Accurate determination of group comparison results depends on stringent group matching.
引用
收藏
页码:967 / 982
页数:16
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] BATES E, 1990, INT C INF STUD MONTR
  • [2] The neurocognitive profile of Williams syndrome: A complex pattern of strengths and weaknesses
    Bellugi, U
    Lichtenberger, L
    Jones, W
    Lai, Z
    St George, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 12 : 7 - 29
  • [3] Bellugi U., 1988, LANGUAGE DEV EXCEPTI, P177
  • [4] BENNETT FC, 1978, PEDIATRICS, V61, P303
  • [5] Bishop D., 1989, TEST RECEPTION GRAMM
  • [6] Bishop D. V. M., 2003, Test for Reception of Grammar-Version 2, V2nd ed.
  • [7] Bowerman M., 1996, Language and space, V385, P436
  • [8] Cassidy Suzanne B, 2002, Adv Pediatr, V49, P59
  • [9] THINGS I HAVE LEARNED (SO FAR)
    COHEN, J
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1990, 45 (12) : 1304 - 1312
  • [10] Csanyi F. I., 1974, PEABODY SZOKINCS TES