Sample size calculation should be performed for design accuracy in diagnostic test studies

被引:343
|
作者
Flahault, A [1 ]
Cadilhac, M
Thomas, G
机构
[1] Hop Tenon, Unite Biostat & Informat Med, F-75970 Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris 06, INSERM, Unite 707, F-75571 Paris, France
关键词
sensitivity; specificity; sample size; binomial distribution; diagnostic test;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.12.009
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Objectives: Guidelines for conducting studies and reading medical literature on diagnostic tests have been published: Requirements for the selection of cases and controls, and for ensuring a correct reference standard are now clarified. Our objective was to provide tables for sample size determination in this context. Study Design and Setting: In the usual situation, where the prevalence Prev of the disease of interest is < 0.50, one first determines the minimal number N-cases of cases required to ensure a given precision of the sensitivity estimate. Computations are based on the binomial distribution, for user-specified type I and type II error levels. The minimal number N-controls, of controls is then derived so as to allow for representativeness of the study population, according to N-controls = N-cases [(1 - Prev)/Prev]. Results: Tables give the values of N-cases corresponding to expected sensitivities from 0.60 to 0.99, acceptable lower 95% confidence limits from 0.50 to 0.98, and 5% probability of the estimated lower confidence limit being lower than the acceptable level. Conclusion: When designing diagnostic test studies, sample size calculations should be performed in order to guarantee the design accuracy. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:859 / 862
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sample size calculations for studies designed to evaluate diagnostic test accuracy
    Adam J. Branscum
    Wesley O. Johnson
    Ian A. Gardner
    Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 2007, 12 : 112 - 127
  • [2] Sample size calculations for studies designed to evaluate diagnostic test accuracy
    Branscum, Adam J.
    Johnson, Wesley O.
    Gardner, Ian A.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL STATISTICS, 2007, 12 (01) : 112 - 127
  • [3] Bayesian sample size determination for prevalence and diagnostic test studies in the absence of a gold standard test
    Dendukuri, N
    Rahme, E
    Bélisle, P
    Joseph, L
    BIOMETRICS, 2004, 60 (02) : 388 - 397
  • [4] Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informatics
    Hajian-Tilaki, Karimollah
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2014, 48 : 193 - 204
  • [5] Bayesian sample size determination for diagnostic accuracy studies
    Wilson, Kevin J.
    Williamson, S. Faye
    Allen, A. Joy
    Williams, Cameron J.
    Hellyer, Thomas P.
    Lendrem, B. Clare
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 41 (15) : 2908 - 2922
  • [6] User's guide to sample size estimation in diagnostic accuracy studies
    Akoglu, Haldun
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 22 (04): : 177 - 185
  • [7] Using meta-analysis to inform the design of subsequent studies of diagnostic test accuracy
    Hinchliffe, Sally R.
    Crowther, Michael J.
    Phillips, Robert S.
    Sutton, Alex J.
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2013, 4 (02) : 156 - 168
  • [8] Sample size and power calculation in comparing diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers with pooled assessments
    Liu, AY
    Schisterman, EF
    Teoh, E
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2004, 31 (01) : 49 - 59
  • [9] Determining sample size for a binary diagnostic test in the presence of verification bias
    Shan, Guogen
    Zhang, Hua
    Jiang, Tao
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2018, 28 (06) : 1193 - 1202
  • [10] Simulation-based sample-size calculation for designing new clinical trials and diagnostic test accuracy studies to update an existing meta-analysis
    Crowther, Michael J.
    Hinchliffe, Sally R.
    Donald, Alison
    Sutton, Alex J.
    STATA JOURNAL, 2013, 13 (03) : 451 - 473