Sample size calculation should be performed for design accuracy in diagnostic test studies

被引:353
作者
Flahault, A [1 ]
Cadilhac, M
Thomas, G
机构
[1] Hop Tenon, Unite Biostat & Informat Med, F-75970 Paris, France
[2] Univ Paris 06, INSERM, Unite 707, F-75571 Paris, France
关键词
sensitivity; specificity; sample size; binomial distribution; diagnostic test;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.12.009
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Objectives: Guidelines for conducting studies and reading medical literature on diagnostic tests have been published: Requirements for the selection of cases and controls, and for ensuring a correct reference standard are now clarified. Our objective was to provide tables for sample size determination in this context. Study Design and Setting: In the usual situation, where the prevalence Prev of the disease of interest is < 0.50, one first determines the minimal number N-cases of cases required to ensure a given precision of the sensitivity estimate. Computations are based on the binomial distribution, for user-specified type I and type II error levels. The minimal number N-controls, of controls is then derived so as to allow for representativeness of the study population, according to N-controls = N-cases [(1 - Prev)/Prev]. Results: Tables give the values of N-cases corresponding to expected sensitivities from 0.60 to 0.99, acceptable lower 95% confidence limits from 0.50 to 0.98, and 5% probability of the estimated lower confidence limit being lower than the acceptable level. Conclusion: When designing diagnostic test studies, sample size calculations should be performed in order to guarantee the design accuracy. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:859 / 862
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   STATISTICS NOTES - DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS-1 - SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY .3. [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
BLAND, JM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 308 (6943) :1552-1552
[2]   DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS-2 - PREDICTIVE VALUES .4. [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
BLAND, JM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 309 (6947) :102-102
[3]  
[Anonymous], MATH SYSTEM DOING MA
[4]  
Armitage P, 1987, STAT METHODS MED RES, V2, P117
[5]   ESTIMATING SAMPLE SIZES FOR BINARY, ORDERED CATEGORICAL, AND CONTINUOUS OUTCOMES IN 2 GROUP COMPARISONS [J].
CAMPBELL, MJ ;
JULIOUS, SA ;
ALTMAN, DG .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 311 (7013) :1145-1148
[6]   SIMPLE SAS MACROS FOR THE CALCULATION OF EXACT BINOMIAL AND POISSON CONFIDENCE-LIMITS [J].
DALY, L .
COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 1992, 22 (05) :351-361
[7]  
*EUR AG EV MED PRO, 2001, CPMPEWP111998 EUR AG
[8]   USERS GUIDES TO THE MEDICAL LITERATURE .3. HOW TO USE AN ARTICLE ABOUT A DIAGNOSTIC-TEST .A. ARE THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY VALID [J].
JAESCHKE, R ;
GUYATT, G ;
SACKETT, DL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (05) :389-391
[9]   USERS GUIDES TO THE MEDICAL LITERATURE .3. HOW TO USE AN ARTICLE ABOUT A DIAGNOSTIC-TEST .B. WHAT ARE THE RESULTS AND WILL THEY HELP ME IN CARING FOR MY PATIENTS [J].
JAESCHKE, R ;
GUYATT, GH ;
SACKETT, DL ;
GUYATT, G ;
BASS, E ;
BRILLEDWARDS, P ;
BROWMAN, G ;
COOK, D ;
FARKOUH, M ;
GERSTEIN, H ;
HAYNES, B ;
HAYWARD, R ;
HOLBROOK, A ;
JUNIPER, E ;
LEE, H ;
LEVINE, M ;
MOYER, V ;
NISHIKAWA, J ;
OXMAN, A ;
PATEL, A ;
PHILBRICK, J ;
RICHARDSON, WS ;
SAUVE, S ;
SACKETT, D ;
SINCLAIR, J ;
TROUT, KS ;
TUGWELL, P ;
TUNIS, S ;
WALTER, S ;
WILSON, M .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (09) :703-707
[10]   Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the cross-sectional study [J].
Knottnerus, JA ;
Muris, JW .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (11) :1118-1128