Contemporary Management of Electrical Storm

被引:45
|
作者
Geraghty, Lucy [1 ]
Santangeli, Pasquale [2 ]
Tedrow, Usha B. [3 ]
Shivkumar, Kalyanam [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Kumar, Saurabh [7 ]
机构
[1] Westmead Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Hosp Univ Penn, Div Cardiovasc, Electrophysiol Sect, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Inst Heart & Vasc, Boston, MA USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Cardiac Arrhythmia Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Neurocardiol Res Program Excellence, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[6] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Mol Cellular & Integrat Physiol Program, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[7] Univ Sydney, Westmead Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Westmead Appl Res Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Ventricular tachycardia; Electrical storm; Ventricular fibrillation; Catheter ablation; Neuraxial modulation; IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATORS; VENTRICULAR-TACHYCARDIA ABLATION; STRUCTURAL HEART-DISEASE; CATHETER ABLATION; INTRAVENOUS AMIODARONE; ANTIARRHYTHMIC-DRUGS; CLINICAL PREDICTORS; ARRHYTHMIA STORM; ICD PATIENTS; FIBRILLATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.hlc.2018.10.005
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Cardiac electrical storm (ES) is characterised by three or more discrete episodes of ventricular arrhythmia within 24 hours, or incessant ventricular arrhythmia for more than 12 hours. ES is a distinct medical emergency that portends a significant increase in mortality risk and often presages progressive heart failure. ES is also associated with psychological morbidity from multiple implanted cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks and exponential health resource utilisation. Up to 30% of ICD recipients may experience storm in follow-up, with the risk higher in patients with a secondary prevention ICD indication. Storm recurs in a high proportion of patients after an initial episode, and multiple storm clusters may occur in follow-up. The mechanism of storm remains elusive but is likely influenced by a complex interplay of inciting triggers (e.g., ischaemia, electrolyte disturbances), with autonomic perturbations acting on a vulnerable structural and electrophysiologic substrate. Triggers can be identified only in a minority of patients. An emergent treatment approach is warranted, if possible with emergent transfer to a high-volume centre for ventricular arrhythmia management with a multi-modality approach including ICD reprogramming, sympathetic blockade (sedation, intubation, ventilation, beta blockers), and anti-arrhythmic drugs, and adjunctive intervention techniques, such as catheter ablation and neuraxial modulation (e.g., thoracic epidural anaesthesia, stellate ganglion block). Outcomes of catheter ablation of ES are excellent with resolution of storm in over 90% of patients at 1 year with a low complication rate (similar to 2%). ES may occur in the absence of structural heart disease in the context of channelopathies, Brugada syndrome, early repolarisation and premature ventricular contraction-induced ventricular fibrillation. There are unique treatment approaches to these conditions that must be recognised. This state-of-the-art review will summarise the incidence, mechanism, and multi-modality treatment of ES in the contemporary era.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 133
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Management of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy: contemporary armamentarium
    Kahle, Ann-Kathrin
    Jungen, Christiane
    Alken, Fares-Alexander
    Scherschel, Katharina
    Willems, Stephan
    Purerfellner, Helmut
    Chen, Shaojie
    Eckardt, Lars
    Meyer, Christian
    EUROPACE, 2022, 24 (04): : 538 - 551
  • [32] Role of electrical storm as a mortality and morbidity risk factor and its clinical predictors: a meta-analysis
    Guerra, Federico
    Shkoza, Matilda
    Scappini, Lorena
    Flori, Marco
    Capucci, Alessandro
    EUROPACE, 2014, 16 (03): : 347 - 353
  • [33] Catheter ablation of electrical storm. Ready for prime time?
    Dechering D.G.
    Frommeyer G.
    Kochhäuser S.
    Eckardt L.
    Herzschrittmachertherapie + Elektrophysiologie, 2014, 25 (2) : 88 - 92
  • [34] Catheter ablation of electrical storm in patients with structural heart disease
    Kozeluhova, Marketa
    Peichl, Petr
    Cihak, Robert
    Wichterle, Dan
    Vancura, Vlastimil
    Bytesnik, Jan
    Kautzner, Josef
    EUROPACE, 2011, 13 (01): : 109 - 113
  • [35] Electrical storm: A clinical and electrophysiological overview
    Conti, Sergio
    Pala, Salvatore
    Biagioli, Viviana
    Del Giorno, Giuseppe
    Zucchetti, Martina
    Russo, Eleonora
    Marino, Vittoria
    Dello Russo, Antonio
    Casella, Michela
    Pizzamiglio, Francesca
    Catto, Valentina
    Tondo, Claudio
    Carbucicchio, Corrado
    WORLD JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 7 (09): : 555 - 561
  • [36] Management of electrical storm of unstable ventricular tachycardia in post myocardial infarction patients: A single centre experience
    Rao, B. Hygriv
    Azam, Mohammed Sadiq
    Manik, Geetesh
    INDIAN HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 70 (02) : 289 - 295
  • [37] Radiofrequency ablation of electrical storm using an epicardial approach in a patient with ischaemic cardiomyopathy
    Baszko, Artur
    Gwizdala, Adrian
    Hulak, Wiestaw
    Perek, Bartiomiej
    Grajek, Stefan
    Szyszka, Andrzej
    KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2011, 69 (08) : 863 - 868
  • [38] Long-term outcome of catheter ablation and other form of therapy for electrical storm in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators
    Morawski, Stanislaw
    Pruszkowska, Patrycja
    Sredniawa, Beata
    Lenarczyk, Radoslaw
    Kalarus, Zbigniew
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 50 (03) : 227 - 234
  • [39] Electrical storm: A focused review for the emergency physician
    Dyer, Sean
    Mogni, Benjamin
    Gottlieb, Michael
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 38 (07) : 1481 - 1487
  • [40] Management of ventricular tachycardia storm
    Zaman, Junaid
    Agarwal, Sharad
    HEART, 2021, 107 (20) : 1671 - 1677