Portal vein embolization versus dual vein embolization for management of the future liver remnant in patients undergoing major hepatectomy: meta-analysis

被引:15
作者
Bell, Richard J. [1 ]
Hakeem, Abdul R. [1 ]
Pandanaboyana, Sanjay [2 ]
Davidson, Brian R. [3 ]
Prasad, Raj K. [1 ]
Dasari, Bobby V. M. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] St James Univ Hosp, Dept Hepatobiliary & Transplant Surg, Leeds, England
[2] Freeman Rd Hosp, Dept Hepatopancreatobiliary HPB & Transplant Surg, Newcastle Upon Tyne, England
[3] Royal Free Hosp, Dept Hepatopancreatobiliary HPB & Transplant Surg, London, England
[4] Univ Hosp Birmingham, Dept Hepatopancreatobiliary HPB & Transplant Surg, Birmingham, England
[5] Univ Birmingham, Sch Med, Birmingham, England
[6] Univ Birmingham, Coll Med & Dent Sci, Birmingham, England
关键词
RESECTION; REGENERATION; HYPERTROPHY; INDUCE; ALPPS;
D O I
10.1093/bjsopen/zrac131
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background This meta-analysis aimed to compare progression to surgery, extent of liver hypertrophy, and postoperative outcomes in patients planned for major hepatectomy following either portal vein embolization (PVE) or dual vein embolization (DVE) for management of an inadequate future liver remnant (FLR). Methods An electronic search was performed of MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed databases using both medical subject headings (MeSH) and truncated word searches. Articles comparing PVE with DVE up to January 2022 were included. Articles comparing sequential DVE were excluded. ORs, risk ratios, and mean difference (MD) were calculated using fixed and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Results Eight retrospective studies including 523 patients were included in the study. Baseline characteristics between the groups, specifically, age, sex, BMI, indication for resection, and baseline FLR (ml and per cent) were comparable. The percentage increase in hypertrophy was larger in the DVE group, 66 per cent in the DVE group versus 27 per cent in the PVE group, MD 39.07 (9.09, 69.05) (P = 0.010). Significantly fewer patients failed to progress to surgery in the DVE group than the PVE group, 13 per cent versus 25 per cent respectively OR 0.53 (0.31, 0.90) (P = 0.020). Rates of post-hepatectomy liver failure 13 per cent versus 22 per cent (P = 0.130) and major complications 20 per cent versus 28 per cent (Clavien-Dindo more than IIIa) (P = 0.280) were lower. Perioperative mortality was lower with DVE, 1 per cent versus 10 per cent (P = 0.010) Conclusion DVE seems to produce a greater degree of hypertrophy of the FLR than PVE alone which translates into more patients progressing to surgery. Higher quality studies are needed to confirm these results. DVE seems to produce a greater hypertrophy than PVE alone. This translates into more patients progressing to surgery with lower post-hepatectomy liver failure and mortality. Higher quality studies are needed to confirm these findings.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Natural history of portal vein embolization before liver resection: a 23-year analysis of intention-to-treat results [J].
Alvarez, Fernando A. ;
Castaing, Denis ;
Figueroa, Rodrigo ;
Allard, Marc Antoine ;
Golse, Nicolas ;
Pittau, Gabriella ;
Ciacio, Oriana ;
Cunha, Antonio Sa ;
Cherqui, Daniel ;
Azoulay, Daniel ;
Adam, Rene ;
Vibert, Eric .
SURGERY, 2018, 163 (06) :1257-1263
[2]   The "50-50 criteria" on postoperative day 5 - An accurate predictor of liver failure and death after hepatectomy [J].
Balzan, S ;
Belghiti, J ;
Farges, O ;
Ogata, S ;
Sauvanet, A ;
Delefosse, D ;
Durand, F .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2005, 242 (06) :824-829
[3]   Liver Venous Deprivation (LVD) Versus Portal Vein Embolization (PVE) Alone Prior to Extended Hepatectomy: A Matched Pair Analysis [J].
Boening, Georg ;
Fehrenbach, Uli ;
Auer, Timo Alexander ;
Neumann, Konrad ;
Jonczyk, Martin ;
Pratschke, Johann ;
Schoening, Wenzel ;
Schmelzle, Moritz ;
Gebauer, Bernhard .
CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 45 (07) :950-957
[4]  
Carling U, 2022, CARDIOVASC INTER RAD, V45, P450, DOI 10.1007/s00270-021-03014-w
[5]   Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [J].
Cumpston, Miranda ;
Li, Tianjing ;
Page, Matthew J. ;
Chandler, Jacqueline ;
Welch, Vivian A. ;
Higgins, Julian P. T. ;
Thomas, James .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, (10)
[6]   Assessment of Future Remnant Liver Function Using Hepatobiliary Scintigraphy in Patients Undergoing Major Liver Resection [J].
de Graaf, Wilmar ;
van Lienden, Krijn P. ;
Dinant, Sander ;
Roelofs, Joris J. T. H. ;
Busch, Olivier R. C. ;
Gouma, Dirk J. ;
Bennink, Roelof J. ;
van Gulik, Thomas M. .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2010, 14 (02) :369-378
[7]   METHODS FOR COMBINING RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIALS - STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS [J].
DEMETS, DL .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1987, 6 (03) :341-350
[8]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[9]   Study protocol of the HYPER-LIV01 trial: a multicenter phase II, prospective and randomized study comparing simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization to portal vein embolization for hypertrophy of the future liver remnant before major hepatectomy for colo-rectal liver metastases [J].
Deshayes, Emmanuel ;
Piron, Lauranne ;
Bouvier, Antoine ;
Lapuyade, Bruno ;
Lermite, Emilie ;
Vervueren, Laurent ;
Laurent, Christophe ;
Pinaquy, Jean-Baptiste ;
Chevallier, Patrick ;
Dohan, Anthony ;
Rode, Agnes ;
Sengel, Christian ;
Guillot, Chloe ;
Quenet, Francois ;
Guiu, Boris .
BMC CANCER, 2020, 20 (01)
[10]   Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey [J].
Dindo, D ;
Demartines, N ;
Clavien, PA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) :205-213