Comparative evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive in class II bulk-fill restorations: A 48-month randomized controlled trial

被引:8
作者
Yazici, Ayse Ruya [1 ]
Tekce, Aybuke Uslu [1 ]
Kutuk, Zeynep Bilge [1 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Universal adhesive; Clinical trial; Bulk-fill; Self-etch; Etch-and-rinse; BONDING PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103921
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the clinical performance of the universal adhesive used in etch-and-rinse (ER) and selfetch (SE) adhesive strategies for 48-month in class II bulk-fill restorations. Methods: A total of 84 class II bulk-fill resin composite (Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill) restorations were placed in 35 participants by one operator using the universal adhesive's (Adhese Universal VivaPen) etch-and-rinse or selfetch mode randomly. The restorations were evaluated by two calibrated examiners at baseline and after 6-, 12-, 24-, 36- and 48-month using modified USPHS criteria. The comparison of the two adhesive strategies for each evaluation criteria was performed with the chi-square test. The baseline scores were compared with those at the recalls using the Friedman and Cochran's Q-test (p < .05). Results: At 48-month, 74 restorations were evaluated in 30 participants (recall rate: 85.7%). Marginal discoloration was statistically more frequent in SE approach (p < .05), whereas no significant difference was observed between the two strategies in terms of marginal adaptation (p > .05). There were statistically significant differences between the baseline and 48-month recall in the SE group in terms of marginal adaptation and discoloration (p < .05). In ER group, significant differences were found between baseline and 48-month only for marginal adaptation (p < .05). None of the restorations showed post-operative sensitivity. Secondary caries was observed in one restoration from SE group. Conclusions: The tested bulk-fill restorative exhibited better clinical performance only in terms of marginal discoloration when the universal adhesive was used with ER strategy. Clinical relevance: Though ER approach of the tested universal adhesive appears to be advantageous in terms of marginal discoloration, both adhesive strategies had similar impact on the clinical success of bulk-fill resin restorations.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Thirty-six-month clinical evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive
    Atalay, Cansu
    Ozgunaltay, Gul
    Yazici, Ayse Ruya
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2020, 24 (04) : 1569 - 1578
  • [2] Internal and marginal adaptation of high-viscosity bulk-fill composites in class II cavities placed with different adhesive strategies
    Haak, Rainer
    Naeke, Thomas
    Park, Kyung-Jin
    Ziebolz, Dirk
    Krause, Felix
    Schneider, Hartmut
    ODONTOLOGY, 2019, 107 (03) : 374 - 382
  • [3] Clinical comparison of different glass ionomer-based restoratives and a bulk-fill resin composite in Class I cavities: A 48-month randomized split-mouth controlled trial
    Bayazit, Elif Ozturk
    Baseren, Meserret
    Meral, Ece
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2023, 131
  • [4] Thirty-six-month clinical evaluation of different adhesive strategies of a universal adhesive
    Cansu Atalay
    Gul Ozgunaltay
    Ayse Ruya Yazici
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2020, 24 : 1569 - 1578
  • [5] Comparative clinical evaluation between self-adhesive and conventional bulk-fill composites in class II cavities: A 1-year randomized controlled clinical study
    Ellithy, Mohamed S.
    Abdelrahman, Mohamed H.
    Afifi, Rania R.
    JOURNAL OF ESTHETIC AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2024, 36 (09) : 1311 - 1325
  • [6] Flowable bulk-fill versus layering restorative material on Class II restorations: A randomized clinical trial
    Torres, Carlos Rocha Gomes
    Mailart, Mariane Cintra
    Moecke, Sabrina Elise
    Matuda, Amanda Guedes Nogueira
    Veloso, Sheyla Mamede
    da Silva Avila, Daniele Mara
    Di Nicolo, Rebeca
    Borges, Alessandra Buhler
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 148
  • [7] Prospective, randomized clinical trial evaluating the clinical performance of a new universal adhesive in Class I and Class II restorations at 1 year
    Perdigao, Jorge
    Chew, Hooi Pin
    Lee, Ignatius K.
    Woodis, Kacie
    Hatch, Brian
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2024, 29 (01)
  • [8] One-year results of a novel self-adhesive bulk-fill restorative and a conventional bulk-fill composite in class II cavities—a randomized clinical split-mouth study
    Fabian Cieplik
    Konstantin J. Scholz
    Julian C. Anthony
    Isabelle Tabenski
    Sarah Ettenberger
    Karl-Anton Hiller
    Wolfgang Buchalla
    Marianne Federlin
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2022, 26 : 449 - 461
  • [9] Influence of different application protocols of universal adhesive system on the clinical behavior of Class I and II restorations of composite resin - a randomized and double-blind controlled clinical trial
    Carvalho, Andreia Assis
    Leite, Murillo Martins
    Zago, Jessica Karla Maia
    Nunes, Carla Aparecida Bernardes Costa Meneses
    Barata, Terezinha de Jesus Esteves
    de Freitas, Gersinei Carlos
    de Torres, Erica Miranda
    Lopes, Lawrence Gonzaga
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2019, 19 (01)
  • [10] Randomized 3-year Clinical Evaluation of Class I and II Posterior Resin Restorations Placed with a Bulk-fill Resin Composite and a One-step Self-etching Adhesive
    van Dijken, Jan W. V.
    Pallesen, Ulla
    JOURNAL OF ADHESIVE DENTISTRY, 2015, 17 (01) : 81 - 88