Estimating the natural indirect effect and the mediation proportion via the product method

被引:17
作者
Cheng, Chao [1 ,2 ]
Spiegelman, Donna [1 ,2 ]
Li, Fan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Yale Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[2] Yale Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Methods Implementat & Prevent Sci, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
关键词
Estimating equations; Mediation analysis; Natural indirect effect; Total effect; Product method; Asymptotically uncorrelated; CAUSAL INFERENCE; FAMILY-HISTORY; RISK-FACTORS; CANCER; INTERVENTIONS; ASSOCIATION; SMOKING; RATIOS;
D O I
10.1186/s12874-021-01425-4
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The natural indirect effect (NIE) and mediation proportion (MP) are two measures of primary interest in mediation analysis. The standard approach for mediation analysis is through the product method, which involves a model for the outcome conditional on the mediator and exposure and another model describing the exposure-mediator relationship. The purpose of this article is to comprehensively develop and investigate the finite-sample performance of NIE and MP estimators via the product method. Methods With four common data types with a continuous/binary outcome and a continuous/binary mediator, we propose closed-form interval estimators for NIE and MP via the theory of multivariate delta method, and evaluate its empirical performance relative to the bootstrap approach. In addition, we have observed that the rare outcome assumption is frequently invoked to approximate the NIE and MP with a binary outcome, although this approximation may lead to non-negligible bias when the outcome is common. We therefore introduce the exact expressions for NIE and MP with a binary outcome without the rare outcome assumption and compare its performance with the approximate estimators. Results Simulation studies suggest that the proposed interval estimator provides satisfactory coverage when the sample size >= 500 for the scenarios with a continuous outcome and sample size >= 20,000 and number of cases >= 500 for the scenarios with a binary outcome. In the binary outcome scenarios, the approximate estimators based on the rare outcome assumption worked well when outcome prevalence less than 5% but could lead to substantial bias when the outcome is common; in contrast, the exact estimators always perform well under all outcome prevalences considered. Conclusions Under samples sizes commonly encountered in epidemiology and public health research, the proposed interval estimator is valid for constructing confidence interval. For a binary outcome, the exact estimator without the rare outcome assumption is more robust and stable to estimate NIE and MP. An R package mediateP is developed to implement the methods for point and variance estimation discussed in this paper.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 56 条
[41]  
Samoilenko M., 2018, Observational Stud, V4, P193, DOI [10.1353/obs.2018.0013, DOI 10.1353/OBS.2018.0013]
[42]   The link between family history and risk of type 2 diabetes is not explained by anthropometric, lifestyle or genetic risk factors: the EPIC-InterAct study [J].
Scott, R. A. .
DIABETOLOGIA, 2013, 56 (01) :60-69
[43]   Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations [J].
Shrout, PE ;
Bolger, N .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2002, 7 (04) :422-445
[44]   Evaluating Public Health Interventions: 6. Modeling Ratios or Differences? Let the Data Tell Us [J].
Spiegelman, Donna ;
VanderWeele, Tyler J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 107 (07) :1087-1091
[45]   Estimation of a semiparametric natural direct effect model incorporating baseline covariates [J].
Tchetgen, E. J. Tchetgen ;
Shpitser, I. .
BIOMETRIKA, 2014, 101 (04) :849-864
[46]   SEMIPARAMETRIC THEORY FOR CAUSAL MEDIATION ANALYSIS: EFFICIENCY BOUNDS, MULTIPLE ROBUSTNESS AND SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS [J].
Tchetgen, Eric J. Tchetgen ;
Shpitser, Ilya .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2012, 40 (03) :1816-1845
[47]  
Tibshirani Robert, 1994, An introduction to the bootstrap
[48]   Mediation Analysis Allowing for Exposure-Mediator Interactions and Causal Interpretation: Theoretical Assumptions and Implementation With SAS and SPSS Macros [J].
Valeri, Linda ;
VanderWeele, Tyler J. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2013, 18 (02) :137-150
[49]   Explanation in causal inference: developments in mediation and interaction [J].
VanderWeele, Tyler J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 45 (06) :1904-1908
[50]   Mediation Analysis: A Practitioner's Guide [J].
VanderWeele, Tyler J. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, VOL 37, 2016, 37 :17-32