Performance of Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams Subjected to Simulated Wind Loading

被引:14
作者
Abdullah, Saman A. [1 ]
Aswegan, Kevin [2 ]
Jaberansari, Shahab [3 ]
Klemencic, Ron [2 ]
Wallace, John W. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Magnusson Klemencic Associates Inc, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Civil Engn, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
关键词
coupling beam; link beam; performance-based wind design; reinforced concrete; seismic loading; wind loading; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.14359/51724555
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Strong wind events are the major factor governing the structural design of many tall buildings in regions with low-to-moderate seismic hazard; however; unlike seismic design, where performance-based design of tall buildings has become common in regions impacted by strong shaking, wind design is still based on linear elastic response under ASCE 7 strength-level demands. Application of performance-based wind design, where modest nonlinear responses are allowed in ductile elements at prescribed locations, has been hampered in part by the lack of experimental data on the performance of key elements subjected to wind loading protocols. For tall concrete buildings subjected to strong winds, allowing modest nonlinearity in coupling beams is an attractive option; therefore, four 2/3-scale reinforced concrete (RC) coupling beams were tested under a simulated windstorm loading protocol, which consists of a large number of elastic load cycles and a dozen mildly inelastic displacement cycles. The test parameters included aspect ratio, presence of floor slab, level of detailing (seismic versus standard), and loading protocol (wind versus seismic). The test results indicate that rotational ductility demands of 1.5 can be achieved with only small residual crack widths (less than 0.0625 in. [1.6 mm]) and no concrete spalling, bar buckling, or bar fracture, indicating that allowing modest inelastic responses in strong wind events may be a viable approach.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 295
页数:13
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
ACI Committee 363, 2010, ACI 363R-10
[2]  
American Concrete Institute ACI, 2019, ACI 318 19 BUILDING
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, C31C31M19 ASTM ASTM
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, ASTM C33/C33M-18 Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates, P8
[5]  
ASCE/SEI, 2016, ASCE 7-16
[6]  
Galano L, 2000, ACI STRUCT J, V97, P876
[7]  
IBC, 2018, INT BUILD COD IBC 20
[8]  
Kwan A.K. H., 2001, STRUCTURES BUILDINGS, V152, P67
[9]  
LATBSDC (Los Angeles Tall Building Structural Design Council), 2017, ALT PROC SEISM AN DE
[10]   Steel-Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams. I: Testing [J].
Motter, Christopher J. ;
Fields, David C. ;
Hooper, John D. ;
Klemencic, Ron ;
Wallace, John W. .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 143 (03)