Cadmium exposure and hypertension in the 1999-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)

被引:252
作者
Tellez-Plaza, Maria [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Navas-Acien, Ana [1 ,2 ]
Crainiceanu, Ciprian M. [4 ]
Guallar, Eliseo [2 ,3 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth Sci, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] CNIC, Dept Cardiovasc Epidemiol & Populat Genet, Madrid, Spain
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[6] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Welch Ctr Prevent Epidemiol & Clin Res, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
blood pressure; cadmium; hypertension; NHANES; smoking;
D O I
10.1289/ehp.10764
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Cadmium induces hypertension in animal models. Epidemiologic studies of cadmium exposure and hypertension, however, have been inconsistent. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the association of blood and urine cadmium with blood pressure levels and with the prevalence of hypertension in U.S. adults who participated in the 1999-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). METHODS: We studied participants >= 20 years of age with determinations of cadmium in blood (n = 10,991) and urine (n = 3,496). Blood and urine cadmium were measured by atomic absorption spectrometry and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry, respectively. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels were measured using a standardized protocol. RESULTS: The geometric means of blood and urine cadmium were 3.77 nmol/L and 2.46 nmol/L, respectively. After multivariable adjustment, the average differences in systolic and diastolic blood pressure comparing participants in the 90th vs. 10th percentile of the blood cadmium distribution were 1.36 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI), -0.28 to 3.001 and 1.68 mmHg (95% Cl, 0.57-2.78), respectively. The corresponding differences were,2.35 mmHg and 3.27 mmHg among never smokers, 1.69 mmHg and 1.55 mmHg among former smokers, and 0.02 mmHg and 0.69 mmHg among current smokers. No association was observed for urine cadmium with blood pressure levels, or for blood and urine cadmium with the prevalence of hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Cadmium levels in blood, but not in urine, were associated with a modest elevation in blood pressure levels. The association was stronger among never smokers, intermediate among former smokers, and small or null among current smokers. Our findings add to the concern of renal and cardiovascular cadmium toxicity at chronic low levels of exposure in the general population.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 56
页数:6
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Tubular and glomerular kidney effects in Swedish women with low environmental cadmium exposure [J].
Åkesson, AA ;
Lundh, T ;
Vahter, M ;
Bjellerup, P ;
Lidfeldt, J ;
Nerbrand, C ;
Samsioe, G ;
Strömberg, U ;
Skerfving, S .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2005, 113 (11) :1627-1631
[2]  
ATSDR, 1999, TOX PROF CADM
[3]   Urinary creatinine concentrations in the US population: Implications for urinary biologic monitoring measurements [J].
Barr, DB ;
Wilder, LC ;
Caudill, SP ;
Gonzalez, AJ ;
Needham, LL ;
Pirkle, JL .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2005, 113 (02) :192-200
[4]  
BEEVERS DG, 1976, LANCET, V2, P1222
[5]   INVERSE RELATION BETWEEN SERUM COTININE CONCENTRATION AND BLOOD-PRESSURE IN CIGARETTE SMOKERS [J].
BENOWITZ, NL ;
SHARP, DS .
CIRCULATION, 1989, 80 (05) :1309-1312
[6]  
Bilgen Ibrahim, 2003, Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology, V14, P55
[7]  
Elinder C. G., 1988, BIOL MONITORING TOXI, P1, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4613-0961-1_1.
[8]   BLOOD-PRESSURE IN SMOKERS AND NONSMOKERS - EPIDEMIOLOGIC FINDINGS [J].
GREEN, MS ;
JUCHA, E ;
LUZ, Y .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1986, 111 (05) :932-940
[9]  
IARC, 1993, IARC MONOGR EVAL CAR, V59, P119
[10]   BIOLOGICAL HALF-TIME OF CADMIUM IN THE BLOOD OF WORKERS AFTER CESSATION OF EXPOSURE [J].
JARUP, L ;
ROGENFELT, A ;
ELINDER, CG ;
NOGAWA, K ;
KJELLSTROM, T .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 1983, 9 (04) :327-331